Strollerderby

They Say: Women Have Special Instinct for "Cute Babies"

Posted by Kate Tuttle

Researchers in England have reported that women are more sensitive than men to signifiers of cutness in babies that include chubby cheeks, button noses, and big eyes. Apparently women scored more highly than men at selecting a computer-generated composite image that blended the features linked most highly with cuteness over another image, also computer-generated, showing a sad little hypotethical baby lacking said features. Men (and menopausal women, it should be added) apparently saw little difference between the two. The drop-off in women's sensitivity to cuteness when they enter menopause leads the researchers to hypothesize that the cause for any gender difference in cute-fancying is hormonal, rather than societal, in nature. 

I have to wonder, though: if this heightened sensitivity to cuteness is being somehow linked to a so-called maternal instinct, wouldn't that indicate a kind of skewed instinct? I mean, what about mothers whose babies aren't so cute? Do they exhibit less attraction, less bonding, less devotion? What kind of maternal instinct would that be? On the contrary, in our house it's I, the woman, who seems to believe that nearly every baby is just incredibly cute, while my husband, the man, makes fine distinctions between babies who are and babies who, regrettably, kind of aren't. I like to think this means I'm more maternal than he is, more willing to take a baby as it comes and love it up, rather than hold it at arm's length if its cheeks are quite up to the chubbiness quotient my hormones have prompted me to desire. In other words, isn't "maternal instinct" (if it exists at all) related to the ability to love even a very sad-looking little baby, the Charlie Brown Christmas tree of babies, just as if it were straight from central casting? 

At the very end of the BBC article reporting the study, a small sad hint at the ugly side of all this: 

Further research will explore whether cuteness sensitivity is a factor in post-natal depression.  

Would that mean that  post-partum depression arises out of having a not-quite-cute-enough infant, or from having an under-developed ability to perceive the cuteness of the baby in one's arms? I await their findings with a skeptical eye. 

 

More by this author:

Biracial Twins -- Is One "Black" and One "White"?

Death by Peanut: Epidemic or Urban Myth?

Is This Baby Obese? Aussie Mom Says No

Baby Nearly Starves to Death, Diluted Formula to Blame

 

 

 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

twinbabiesdad said:

Remember the study that looked at shopping cart safety?

Showed that cuter kids were more likely to be buckled in, and generally prevented from engaging in dangerous behaviors around and in the cart.

Of course, I did't read the whole study, just read a article on it (maybe here), so ther is probably more to it than the headline, but what if there isn't!!!!

January 21, 2009 5:23 PM
 

dhsredhead said:

We should always be skeptical of any study that takes gender of group A and group B and compares data about the two. Real science is not knowing who group A and who group B are, doing a study and then if that data shows a significant difference finding out who was in group A and group B. Also if they thought this might be due to some hormonal difference, why not test to see the hormone levels of these individuals? Or what parts of the brain were activated in this cuteness test?

January 22, 2009 10:19 AM

About Kate Tuttle

I'm raising a toddler and a teenager in a leafy suburb just outside Boston. In between having kids I've been an editor and writer, most recently with the African American National Biography and the late great Africana.com.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage