Strollerderby

They Say: Crack Babies? Not Such a Big Deal

Posted by Madeline Holler

One of the big news stories in the 80s and 90s was about crack babies -- kids whose addict moms continued using during pregnancy and after. The babies -- crack babies -- were born with varying amounts of the drugs in their systems. Much hand-wringing (and social-servicing, and child removal) ensued.

Researchers have been following a significant number of these babies-now-tweens. What's the one thing these researchers have found in the crack babies that truly surprised them? 

Nothing. That is, the hugely harmful outcomes for these children that everybody feared were never borne out. That's good news!

From the NY Times:

So far, these scientists say, the long-term effects of such exposure on children’s brain development and behavior appear relatively small.“Are there differences? Yes,” said Barry M. Lester, a professor of psychiatry at Brown University who directs the Maternal Lifestyle Study, a large federally financed study of children exposed to cocaine in the womb. “Are they reliable and persistent? Yes. Are they big? No.” 

Of course, cocaine is bad for the fetus. But get this: alcohol and cigarettes have been found to be worse. But that's still no reason to re-establish contact with your hook-up.

Again, the Times:

“The argument is not that it’s O.K. to use cocaine in pregnancy, any more than it’s O.K. to smoke cigarettes in pregnancy,” said Dr. Deborah A. Frank, a pediatrician at Boston University. “Neither drug is good for anybody.”

The study showed no significant difference in language development or IQ scores between crack babies and those born to mothers who stayed clean during pregnancy. However, there were notable differences in visual attention and “executive function” — the brain’s ability to set priorities and pay selective attention, enabling the child to focus on the task at hand. Cocaine exposure may also increase the frequency of defiant behavior and poor conduct. Boys may also be more prone to the behavior disorder effects than girls.

This study has interesting implications, especially in light of the fact that crack babies' mothers were often punished more severely than other abusers and more vulnerable to have their children taken out of the home. 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Maria said:

Are you suggesting that children should be left in a home with a parent who is drug user?

If the mother did not stop using during her pregnancy what would suggest that she would place the needs of her out of utero child before her own addiction?

I'm not saying that after treatment a clean mother can't be an awesoem parent but women who ar efound to have used within 24 hours of the delivery of their child should have their infant placed with a relative or in foster care until they have completed a treatment program.

And let's not forget that "notable diferences in visual attention and executive funtion" and an "increase in the frequency of defiant behavior and poor conduct" doesn't make for an easy childhood.

January 27, 2009 9:12 PM
 

Sue said:

Our ten year old daughter was a crack baby at birth, born at two lbs. and ten weeks early. She does have some behavior problems (similar to the ones the article stated) but after she went through withdrawal and we were able to bring her home at five weeks, she thrived and is now a happy, musically-talented girl. The dr. at the time said we were lucky the birth mother didn't use alcohol or smoke, and he was right. Those have been found to have more health implications than crack.

Maria, I don't think Madeline was saying addicted parents should always be allowed to keep their children, but there certainly was a hysteria about crack babies that was fed by irresponsible (yet juicy) stories about it, which served to marginalize the issue unnecessarily.  Alcohol and tobacco are legal and readily available, yet have been shown to be more toxic to the human body than narcotics.

January 28, 2009 8:16 AM
 

tiffany said:

This is crap. These studies can't possibly be extensive.

I am the mom of a "crack baby" whom I adopted 8 years ago. He is now 12, and I have been unable to work in order to take care of him - the damage is so extensive.

Stories like this do nothing but give the addicted mother false comfort.

It's great that some children have come out okay, but we need to be publishing more stories showcasing the kids that did NOT fare so well, and I'm sure there are MANY. But suddenly the media latches onto one study and decides that it's ironic and funny that some of these kids are actually functional. And THAT story is EVERYWHERE!

What's wrong with this picture?

January 28, 2009 1:57 PM
 

Sue said:

So sorry you are having trouble with him, Tiffany :(  We also have another child we adopted at an older age and there was never any substance abuse during pregnancy, but he went through some horrific anger problems (now somewhat better after counseling and getting through those teen years!). So that's another problem with these studies, they can't possibly take all the factors into account. Is it because of overall poor or non-existent prenatal care? The probability that a woman who uses crack throughout her pregnancy might have mental health issues that can be genetic?

I'm not sure if these studies give addicted moms false comfort...I kind of doubt they are seriously reading a newspaper with their morning snort...

I hope things get better with your son and you have lots of support.

January 28, 2009 6:17 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage