Strollerderby

Little White Whales Going, Going...Gone?

Posted by Shannon LC Cate

Move over Cook Inlet Beluga Whales, no more babies in the deep blue sea for you!  Alaska governor, Sarah Palin says that the whale population, having dwindled from a small 650 to its current 375 since 1994 are doing just fine, thank you.  She is suing the federal government for listing the Belugas as endangered.

Why?  Because the protection required by the listing would threaten oil drilling, gas development and other "lucrative" projects, according to Mother Jones.

This isn't the first time Palin has challenged an endangered species listing.  Last August, she asserted the polar ice caps aren't melting and the polar bears will be just fine.  To prove this, she turned to some classic anti-global warming science and was compared to someone "debating the theory of gravity as they plunge off a cliff" by Kieran Suckling, the executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity.

What I don't understand is how a mother and grandmother of babies could be willing to support policies that would most likely lead to the extinction of at least two treasured mammals, not to mention countless less glamorous, but perhaps even more ecologically important species.  None of us know how the destruction of half the biodiversity on the planet will effect what remains--including human beings, assuming they do.

It's time for people in positions to do something to protect our grandchildren's planet to do so.  For all her talk of the value of family, Palin seems awfully eager to sell her babies' futures to her own pockets' present.

See Also:

Penguins March to Extinction

Toddler Attacked by 300 lb Snake

Rare Baby Gorilla Born

National Zoo Inseminates Panda

Image: sheddaquarium.org


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Sue said:

I'd love for the US to become less dependent on foreign oil sources, which would of course necessitate drilling in the US.

Besides, many scientists are now calling it "Global Climate Change" instead of warming, since there's little hard data to prove continual harmful warming.

February 3, 2009 12:51 PM
 

TokyoRose said:

No, Sue, the best way to become less dependent on foreign oil is to USE LESS OIL.  And whether it's "climate change" or "warming" or whatever, the point is that the planet's natural climate rhythms are being changed by human influence, and not for the better.

For Pete's sake.

February 3, 2009 1:58 PM
 

Shannon LC Cate said:

But Sue, if the whales have nearly fallen by 50% and they are such a small population already, and gas and oil development will compromise them further and probably lead to their extinction, how can you say the jury is still out?

I can see how someone might say "well it's a shame but oil/gas/human needs are more important than preserving whales" but the trouble is we don't know what other species go with the whales when/if they go.  We don't know how the loss of these animals will change the balance of the ecosystem and perhaps have some fallout that's bad for people too.

February 3, 2009 2:25 PM
 

Sue said:

I know, Shannon, there really are so many factors. But species have come and gone throughout the millenia, rarely (but sometimes!) due to human influence such as overhunting. We simply do not know, as studies can and do support the group or individual doing the study, and statistics are notably flawed in many areas. It's irresponsible to say "for sure" that such and such is causing this other thing and no natural selection is involved whatsoever.

In my opinion, of course :)

February 3, 2009 6:32 PM
 

Sue said:

Can I just add that I have really been forced to think when reading Shannon's articles and responses? Thanks Shannon, for not treating me like I'm an idiot and instead offering further reasoned statements.

I'll bet you're a great mother.

February 3, 2009 6:43 PM
 

LauraLaura said:

Wow, Sue, that's hands-down one of the most ignorant commentaries I've ever seen on Babble. You honestly think whale and other species could be disappearing via natural selection? You don't realize that species eradication is happening at rates many, many times any species eradication (barring asteroid strikes) that happened in the past? It's not the statistics that are notably flawed; it's whatever whackjob right-wing publications you've been reading that are your problem.

February 3, 2009 6:59 PM
 

Sue said:

No, LauraLaura, I "honestly" think we don't know everything, even leading scientists disagree.

February 3, 2009 7:18 PM
 

Manjari said:

"It's irresponsible to say "for sure" that such and such is causing this other thing and no natural selection is involved whatsoever."

Isn't irresponsible to assume that the whales and other species are just "naturally" becoming extinct? Isn't it irresponsible to ignore what ACTUAL SCIENTISTS are saying, in favor of listening to nonsense? I have a really big problem with this crazy republican attitude that we can come up with an excuse to keep doing just about anything as long is it makes money.

February 3, 2009 7:54 PM
 

LauraLaura said:

To which "leading scientists" do you refer, Sue? I think scientific consensus can safely exclude the opinions of Bible-thumping fundies who got their PhDs off the back of a matchbook.

Did Rush and Sean also tell you the world is flat? I understand experts disagree about that one too.

February 3, 2009 11:39 PM
 

Sue said:

There is no scientific consensus on GW, LL, that's what I'm saying.

But in case you were seriously asking about the scientists, LL, there are many who disagree with the causes and the results of global warming (and very few got their degrees off the back of matchbooks) ;) A simple google search will turn up more than anyone can sift through in a day.

February 4, 2009 12:00 PM
 

LauraLaura said:

Sue: Signing off on this debate. There most certainly IS consensus on global warming, and if you're unable to recognize that, you have your head so far up your anatomical unmentionable that there's no talking to you.

February 4, 2009 1:42 PM
 

Shannon LC Cate said:

For an article on the consensus on global warming and the fact that it is human-caused, see this this link:

www.sciencemag.org/.../1686

Sue, I'm afraid that it may be true that you can always find someone to say something or other is questionable--especially in science.  But the vast majority of experts in this field who are publishing peer-reviewed (versus gas-company-funded, for example) studies are finding that most of the "climate change" we've seen that is leading to the melting of the polar ice caps, (for one example) is caused by human action and could be addressed through human action.

Like I said, as long as one single scientist and/or study says otherwise, you can say there's no conclusive opinion.  But if you are sorting out the different opinions in a scientific, non-biased way yourself, you'll find very little quibbling that global warming is not only happening, it's happening because of people's foolish misuse of the planet's resources.

February 4, 2009 1:57 PM

About Shannon LC Cate

Shannon LC Cate, PhD is a lesbian housewife and work-from-home mother of two girls via domestic, open, transracial adoption. They are both under five and already too brilliant and beautiful for their own good. Shannon lives, writes and assembles tricycles in Chicago, Illinois.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage