Strollerderby

Game Over: The Recession Hits Kids' Sports

Posted by Shannon LC Cate

As families cut back in difficult times, one thing that seems to be going is kids' sports team participation.   When a parent loses a job, or has a pay cut, the fees for summer camps, special leagues or even school teams are becoming burdensome, leaving some otherwise athletic kids at home on the couch.

Some of the organizations that sponsor kids' sports are trying to change the way they operate to make themselves more affordable to families who've fallen on hard times.  Some are offering payment schedules, scholarships or (in what I consider not such a great idea) credit card payment options.

Nevertheless, many sports organizations report that participation is down by as much as 30-40% from recent years.

For kids in middle and high-school, who are exceptionally talented and hoping for college scholarships, this can be a serious crisis.  but for kids who are playing mostly for fun or at earlier ages, it is hard for me to see this as a huge problem.  One suggestion given by child psychologist, Matthew Parvin, is that families start playing informal games together or starting their own neighbor leagues or pickup games.  I confess, sports have never been very important to me, but I can sympathize with the heartbreak of a child who really wants to play when mom and dad just can't afford the fees.

Have you had to cut back on any activities beloved by your kids to make your budget balance?  If so, have you tried any strategies to compensate for what was cut?  How have they worked out?


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Jen S. said:

The challenge is finding suitable activities to keep kids occupied during those troublesome afterschool hours. You're right, it's not the end of the world, however sports programs are a fun, generally healthy, easy way to fill the afterschool need.  I know you don't see losing sports as a crisis, but how would you feel if it were a music program or something your child really loved to do?  Those other extracurricular activities are typically next on the chopping block.

March 28, 2009 12:09 PM
 

Shannon LC Cate said:

Heck, I know.  Music and arts are actually first on public funding chopping blocks--well ahead of sports.

But I was actually thinking of our family's decision to delay formal music lessons for our older daughter, for budget reasons and tying that to how others might feel about sports.  In our case, delaying the start of something is not as hard as stopping something a child already loves, though.

March 28, 2009 1:58 PM
 

Jen S. said:

True, not starting in the first place is easier than having to redirect.  Sorry, I know you're not ignorant in this area, I got distracted by your statement as not seeing it as a huge problem.  And, as I said earlier it's not the end of the world.  I mainly see some problems occuring at the junior high/high school level.  Younger kids are easier to redirect so I don't see huge issues if you have to change activities up to 12-13 years old. Oh, I guess I forgot to actually answer the question you were asking in your post too.  :P  We haven't had to cut any activities yet, but I've thought about that possibility quite a bit. We're swimming at the moment. My kids are young enough however that I can pretty much stop any activity with a brief explanation and that's the end of it.  I'm not particularly creative with devising preschooler activities, so I've been browsing the internet lately and working on a list of inexpensive or free "activities" that we can try out whether or not we have to cut out the swimming.

March 28, 2009 8:55 PM
 

Shannon LC Cate said:

Parks and Rec is so darn cheap, it's not funny.  I didn't feel bad when my daughter decided she didn't want to go tap dancing lessons after trying three and having five left because it was just $20 for the eight-week session anyway.  And it seems like a lot of P&R departments offer a nice wide variety of things so for little kids who haven't already set their hearts on one particular activity, it's a great way to go.

March 28, 2009 9:33 PM
 

Twyla said:

Sports are very expensive and I think we are on the cheap side. Right now we have a 13 year old who plays competetive soccer. He costs $110 a season with 2 seasons a year. Plus his practices are 20 miles away twice a week. Our 8 year old is in minor softball and our 4 year old starts t-ball next week. The girls' sports cost a total of $90 this season. We have not cut the sports out of our small budget at this point because the kids like the sports and they are very beneficial to thier development. (My opinion).

It has been nice this year with our middle schooler because school sports are free. (His school does not have a soccer program). They have cut out the amount of games the kids have, though, for budget reasons.

March 28, 2009 11:43 PM

About Shannon LC Cate

Shannon LC Cate, PhD is a lesbian housewife and work-from-home mother of two girls via domestic, open, transracial adoption. They are both under five and already too brilliant and beautiful for their own good. Shannon lives, writes and assembles tricycles in Chicago, Illinois.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage