Strollerderby

Child Support Suffers In A Recession, Too

Posted by Kate Tuttle

A bad economy tends to spawn domino effects of harm. As workers lose their jobs, the folks who depend on their paycheck -- whether the bank that owns their mortgage or retail store owners or service employees -- all take a hit as well. Least able to protect themselves, and wholly unable to find another source of support, are the children of laid-off workers. As a recent article in the New York Times suggests, the picture can get especially complicated when the paycheck that's lost was formerly provided by a non-custodial parent in the form of child support.

Since the beginning of this year, New York's family court system has been deluged by requests for reduction in child support orders by parents (mostly fathers) who have lost their jobs and can no longer meet their mandated obligations. In many if not most cases, judges have no choice but to reduce the support order until the father can find a way to pay. Needless to say, this doesn't always sit well with the custodial parents (usually mothers) who have to figure out how to provide food and shelter and clothing on less and less money. It's a bad scene all around.

Some of the stories out of New York are utterly astonishing, like the couple formerly making a combined $400,000 a year who both lost their jobs simultaneously, and are now trying to live on $800 a month in unemployment benefits. But most are not nearly as rich to begin with, like the man making just over $16K a year (how do you live on that in New York?) and required to send 23% of his salary to support his child in Georgia. The mother is angry, the father is angry, both are broke and, of course, it's the child who suffers most of all. 

Even those of us not currently factoring child support into our monthly responsibilities are finding ourselves having to make choices in terms of what we can and can't afford for our kids these days. I know I'm not alone in weighing the yoga classes, summer camp, and new bike ideas more seriously than ever. I want this economic nightmare to end for all kinds of reasons, but most of all so that our kids don't have to worry about money -- or, in the very worst cases, about food and shelter. 

 

More by this author:

Late-Term Abortion Provider on Trial in Kansas

Boomer Grandmothers: Out Of Control?

Move Over, Booties! Here Come Knitted Boobies

Think Your Baby's Car Seat Is Safe? Think Again

 

 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

SupportNightmare said:

Child support in this country is SO unfair.  My husband has two children from our marriage and one from an old relationship and that "son" costs him more than our children.  This is the first balanced article I have seen in decades on the subject.  Guess what?!  Men are not cash cows.  Shocking.  

March 30, 2009 11:29 AM
 

mistress_scorpio said:

I read that NYT story... everyone suffers, but no one more than the children. Truly awful.

March 30, 2009 12:18 PM
 

Knitty said:

The couple who was making 400K a year really should have stashed a little away for rainy days.

It isn't any easier for kids who live with their now-broke and unemployed parents.  I have very clear, stark memories of the year and a half my father was unemployed during the horrible 80's recession.  Our home became a very dark, frightening place.

March 30, 2009 12:29 PM
 

sara said:

<i>. But most are not nearly as rich to begin with</i>

Apparently they weren't rich, or they wouldn't be scrambling now -- let's not confuse income with wealth. I can't muster sympathy for people who fritter away their plentiful salaries in good times and then complain about making private school payments in bad.

March 30, 2009 3:28 PM
 

Twyla said:

I agree that child support is an unfair system. I am lucky to have an ex that doesn't mind his responsibility. I am grateful that child support has not become an issue for us and we are able to see past the details and work on the bigger picture: our daughter.

Oh yeah, and my ex is on unemployment because he lost his job, house, etc. Still, he volunteers to pay for half of her sports, school needs, etc. while maintaining the same amount of child support as when he was working.

The amount is set by the state, not by me. Just wanted to throw that in there before I was accused of being a gold digger or something.

March 31, 2009 1:45 PM
 

brokemom said:

The judge has refused TWICE to lower my husband's child support for his seperate children. Actually, the last time they lowered it by $15. Big difference, huh? Meanwhile, the arrears on $900 a month keep building up, and at TEN PERCENT INTEREST, means we will be paying it off for years and years to come. $900 a month payment, based on income he does not have, has not had for over a year,and will not have for a while, if ever.  What a corck. Ventura County is against fathers.

April 3, 2009 4:09 PM

About Kate Tuttle

I'm raising a toddler and a teenager in a leafy suburb just outside Boston. In between having kids I've been an editor and writer, most recently with the African American National Biography and the late great Africana.com.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage