Strollerderby

Judge’s Ruling: Parents Fearing Swine Flu Can’t Keep Kids Home

Posted by SunnyChanel

 

So you’re sitting at home totally freaking out about the Swine flu. One of the first things you want to do is protect your family, right?  One way would be to keep your children out of the Petri dish that’s called school.  But if you live in Montgomery Alabama, you’re out of luck. Even though you’re freaked out about the odds of one of your kids becoming victim of a pandemic, you still have to send them to school.

A mom and dad of two boys pleaded with a court judge to let them keep up with there school work from home rather than going to school each day, all because of the swine flu scare. The parents had asked that their 7 and 8 year-old son be excused until the end of the school year, which is May 21st.  What was the judges verdict? He said no.

An attorney for the school said that allowing this would "create chaos…if the Blevins were allowed to do this, then why not let every parent take their children out of school?" The judge did give the family a couple of options like home schooling or enrolling them in private school, but otherwise they could face charges of violating truancy laws.

In a situation like this, where there is fear of a scary illness, do you think parents should have the option to keep their kids out of school?

 Related!
Why Swine Flu is Bad for the Economy


Source


 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Sue said:

As a teacher, I would have to agree with the judge.  When students are not in school, they are not receiving the full education.  Any decision that is made in a court sets a precedent.  If the judge went with the parents, schools would be empty during flu season each year.  That being said, it is utterly ridiculous that this even had to go to the court system.  Why couldn't the parents have simply been cautious instead of proclaiming that their children would be absent for the rest of the school year?

May 4, 2009 9:21 PM
 

Rebecca D said:

I agree with the parent. I have thought about doing this myself. If something happens to one of those boys because their parents were forced to send their kids to school it will fall on the school & as a parent I would sue the heck out of them. How dare someone make me send my children to school when their is an illness than can cause death floating around? Apparently the all mighty dollar is more important than a child's well being.

May 6, 2009 12:48 PM
 

Liz said:

I think it should have been considered. I have a 13yr old and 6 yr old in school and I am extremely worried. Not only about their well being but lets remember there are other family members in a household that get exposed to these increased risks of having a child attending school. What about the pregnant moms, elderly or younger siblings?? I have a 6 month old baby at home. It should be an option,  after all there isnt much time left for school to finish. The loss of a few weeks of school is better than a possibly deadly flu.

May 18, 2009 3:20 AM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage