Strollerderby

Should Healthcare Reform Start in the Maternity Ward?

Posted by Madeline Holler

While the Obama administration tries to hammer out healthcare reform -- one based, necessarily, on reducing costs -- surely (SURELY!) they are taking a hard look at childbirth in the U.S.

According to a 2008 report from the think tank Childbirth Connections, pregnancy is the most expensive condition for private insurers and Medicaid.

A recent article in the LA Times business (!) section puts together numbers that insurance companies and some doctors are starting to look at, as the former attempts to lower its costs and the latter attempts to improve outcomes.

Ahh, but what a thorny issue for a president to become involved in!

First, the surprises:

Childbirth is the No. 1 reason for hospital admission in the U.S.

Childbirth accounts for $79 billion in hospital charges alone of the nation's $2.4 trillion annual healthcare expenditures.

Cesarean sections are the most common surgery in the U.S.

Though one-third of all U.S. births are c-sections, rates among hospitals have mind-boggling variation. Among California hospitals, the c-section rate can be anywhere from 16 percent to 62 percent. 

All those surgeries cost a fortune -- at an average of $4,500 for a c-section, that's twice as much as a vaginal birth in the hospital. For the privately insured, that number reaches an average of $13,000 for uncomplicated sections.

All these c-sections haven't improved outcomes. In fact, maternal deaths have risen since 2002.

Also, 48 percent of newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care units were from scheduled deliveries -- sections or inductions -- many of them before 39 weeks.

Miscalculated dates for inductions intended for 39 weeks gestation are also sending a growing number of newborns to the NICU until they can breathe on their own.

From the LA Times:

"We're going in the wrong direction," said Dr. Roger A. Rosenblatt, a University of Washington professor of family medicine who has written about what he calls the "perinatal paradox," in which more intervention, such as cesareans, is linked with declining outcomes, such as neonatal intensive care admissions. Maternity care, he said, "is a microcosm of the entire medical enterprise."

More Posts

City's 5th Co-Sleeping Death in 10 Weeks Reported

550-Pound Woman Gives Birth

Issues! 'Parenting' Offers Fake Apology

If This Guy's Going Broke, is There Hope for the Rest of Us?

Babble Talk Radio: Kids These Days!

Federal Agent* Seizes Oat-Based Contraband

Photo: LA Times


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

CV said:

The first thing that should be looked at is length of stay (or more accurately - lack of length).  We could have been discharged at 11:30 pm on Friday night after giving birth on Thursday at 9 pm.  Thankfully they gave us a "courtesy stayover" at no charge because there wasn't a backlog of rooms.  24 hour stay after a vaginal delivery is asininely short.  You're still in pain, can barely move without leaving a trail of blood like you're an assault victim, likely have stitches, and you're to go home with this tiny little being?  

My Dr. and I scheduled an induction for AFTER my due date, but had to put in the request at my 37 wk appt as another practice in town frequently scheduled "convenience" inductions at 39 weeks, leaving my Dr's practice in the lurch if they had an overdue woman in need of an induction.  We figured better to schedule and not need.  Turns out I did, turns out to be a good thing he was induced and didn't go on his own - relatively chaos free, so long as I laid on my back and had an oxygen mask on, which is incredibly uncomfortable.  Had I been at home, I'd have made myself comfy...which was not on my back, which would have caused his heart rate to drop.

May 19, 2009 2:47 PM
 

GP said:

different experiences for different women

I had a homebirth at 9 pm and was ready to walk to the pediatrician's office a few blocks away the next late morning

if I was in a hospital and they MADE me stay over 24 hours, I'd have been itching to get the hell out

May 19, 2009 4:23 PM
 

CV said:

Exactly GP - but the option should be there to check out early with Dr's permission, not be kicked out at 24 hours.  

May 20, 2009 7:59 AM
 

GP said:

yeah, nobody should be kicked out of the hospital until they are ready!

May 20, 2009 1:41 PM
 

Lisa said:

i had a 2nd c-sect and was released 44 hours after delivery.  my baby was jaundiced so I was sleeping 54 hours after a c-section in the ped floor in a semi-private room,bleeding like a stuckpig on a short hard couch.  We were there until 72 hours postpartum.  

My incision opened up less than 24 hours later.

12 weeks later it still hasn't closed completely.

May 20, 2009 10:15 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage