Strollerderby

Browse by Tags

(RSS)
  • Supreme Court to Father: No, You Can't Circumcise a 13-year-old

    I'm not even a guy, but this story made me want to pull a Michael Jackson and grab a little boy, uh, my crotch. Well, that and grab the not-so-little boy whose father wants to have him circumcised and run.

    James Boldt has actually been shot down by the United States Supreme Court in his bid to have the highest court in the land hear his plea to circumcise his 13-year-old son. That doesn't mean the case is closed, however. A trial judge in Oregon will now get the case that's been argued since the boy was 9 and agreed to follow his father in a conversion to Judaism. Boldt, who has custody of the boy, had actually scheduled the procedure when his ex-wife, Lia, stepped in.

     

    Read More...


  • Supreme Court Allows Parents of Special-Ed Kids to Sue School District Without a Lawyer

    justice scalesIt shows how far I have come in the world of special education to understand how huge this new U.S. Supreme Court ruling is. I had no idea until relatively recently how much some parents of kids with disabilities have to battle to receive appropriate services for their children within the public school system. But until you're in that world, there's just no way to know.

    In this case, parents Jeff and Sandee Winkelman believed their son Jacob, who has autism, would benefit from placement in a private school that specialized in autism. Instead, the school district placed Jacob in a public school. Under the U.S. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, children have the right to receive a "free, appropriate public school education". The key word there is "appropriate", as often what the school district determines is "enough" for a child is a far cry from what the parents, who know the child best, feel should be provided. Jacob ended up going to the private school anyway, to the tune of more than $50,000. They could not even afford a lawyer to represent them to fight for what they believed Jacob needed.

    The new ruling allows parents to sue their districts without a lawyer, thus keeping the costs down of fighting for their children's rights. While I certainly am not an advocate for the increasing litigiousness prevalent in our society today, I certainly am in favor of protecting the rights of children who really need the extra help. I have yet to really need to go to bat for my son Eric,who's three, has Down syndrome, and attends a public special-education preschool, but you can bet that when and if I feel he needs more than the school district is willing to provide, I'll be grateful, as many parents already are, for any help I can get.



in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage