Strollerderby

Browse by Tags

(RSS)
  • Children of Polygamy Cult Returned to Parents

    A dozen of the children removed from the FLDS Polygamy cult in Texas are being reunited with their families. Said parents and children will be allowed to live together under state supervision until a verdict comes down from  the Texas Supreme Court. They may not, however, return to their Yearning For Zion ranch for the time being.

    Last Friday an appeals court ruled the state had no right to take the children into custody...



    Read More...


  • Custody Court Tells Mom to Stop Breastfeeding Toddler

    court gavelA custody court is telling a Minnesota mom that she must stop breastfeeding her 15-month old toddler because of the medications she takes for migraines, complications from an auto accident, and sleep problems. While the pharmocopeia ingested by nursing mom Christa Burton is certainly an issue, what concerns me more is that her behavior is being examined more closely simply because she's involved in a custody dispute of son Carter, born 6 weeks premature, and that a court is telling a mother what she can and cannot do.

    Read More...


  • Another Non-Father Emasculated By Support Court: Pay Up or Go to Jail

    money clip father is bankerIn yet another stroke of judicial brilliance, Missouri resident David Salazar lost his appeal with a Missouri court this week and has been ordered to pay over $13000 in back child support or face a felony charge punishable by four years in prison, all because he and his estranged wife were too poor to get a divorce before she had a baby with another man.  Even though both Mr. Salazar and the child's mother have testified that they separated well before she became pregnant and that he is not the child's father,  the court would have none of it because Mr. Salazar, who didn't graduate from high school and likely was even unaware of what was taking place, failed to contest the original determination of support within the stipulated time.

    Read More...


  • Another Sperm Donor Gets Stuck Paying Child Support

    blind justiceHello, court system?  Uh, could you please review your purpose, and get back to me?  I'm really wondering what the hell you're doing these days.  To wit:

    In another strike against justice for sperm donors, a Chicago man was "duped" into signing paternity papers after providing sperm for the insemination of his ex-girlfriend, and after two years of court hijinks, has now agreed (read:  was railroaded into agreeing) to provide "limited financial support" for the twins.  Which includes sending them to college.  Hey, nice work if you can get it!

    He didn't even have sex and he's still paying for it.

     Thanks, court system!  I can hardly wait to see what you come up with next. 


  • Dead Israeli Soldier Lives On Through Sperm

    spermI remember a long-ago and very moving episode of a popular hospital TV show (ERChicago Hope? St. Elsewhere even?) where the husband was dying and on life-support, and the caring and thoughtful hospital staff looked the other way while the grieving but very much childless widow-to-be, uh, inseminated herself via her husband before they pulled the plug on his respirator.  I know, I know, it sounds like a smarmy Jay Leno joke, but it was actually very touching, thinking that this was the only way that the wife could have a living piece of her beloved husband, a part of him that would live on in his stead.  C'mon, don't you want to tear up here, just a little?  This is, like, life!

    Which is why I am completely in favor of a precedent-setting recent ruling in an Israeli court that allows the family of a dead unmarried soldier to use his sperm (extracted only hours after his death) to inseminate a woman of their choosing in order to continue the family's bloodline, granting the soldier a child he'll never know. Okay, maybe it's just a little creepy.  But still!  Think of the possibilities! (and who pays child support?)  By the way?  A CNN poll says a big fat NO to potential grandparents using their child's sperm to create a grandchild.

    What do you think?  Does this cross a line?  Or is it a moving and beautiful new expression of the incredible urge we have a humans to continue as a species?


  • Man Must Pay Child Support for Son of a Sperm Bank

    gavel courtThrough my own dealings with the domestic relations court system this past couple of years, I know that the system is pretty well screwed up.  And as screwed up as it's been for me, I'm glad I'm not this guy.  He's been ordered to pay child support for a child which everybody agrees isn't his, a child conceived after his divorce from a woman who subsequently was inseminated by an anonymous sperm-bank donation.  So even though both the ex-husband and the ex-wife agree that "that the unborn child is not the biological child of the husband," and they agree that "ex-husband should in 'no way be financially responsible in any way' for the child or his ex-wife", he still has to pay.

    Because someone has to, I guess.  And because the judge said the parties' agreement was "against public policy".  Public policy??!  What about stupidity?  Which seems to be at work here.


  • Arkansas Court Rules That Non-Father Must Pay Child Support

    Anthony Parker is not a father. According to his lawyer, Anthony Parker has never claimed to be a father. Yet an Arkansas judge has decided that Anthony Parker must pay child support.

    I'll be honest with you, dear readers. It's about 9:00 and my wife and I just got back from a nice dinner, during which many glasses of wine were consumed. Yeah, I'm a little drunk. This article, it confuses me. Maybe it's the vino. So I gotta ask you - is that article fer reals? It's not an Onion piece? I didn't fall through some temporal rift and end up in the future, on April 1st? There wasn't some bizarre computer glitch that caused the Arkansas court system to reunite O.J.'s jury for another trial? (On the other hand - $24 bucks a week for child support? What the hell does this kid eat? Tic Tacs?)

    Apparently, Parker had ignored the state's Office of Child Support Enforcement's paternity complaint, filed in 2002; the state went after him after he failed to pay the initial judgment, and he further buggered himself by failing to appear in court. The state garnished his wages, and even though Parker ultimately proved, via a paternity test, that he was not the father the state's Supreme Court ruled that he still owes in excess of $4,000 in back child support. For a child that's not his. If that seems a little bass-ackwards, well, it's Arkansas. One of course wonders where the actual father is during all of this. Maybe it's my West Coast liberal mentality, but shouldn't he be the one to pay for child support? Parker's lawyer's have released a photo of the man, and though as an objective journalist I really shouldn't get involved, my conscience won't allow me to turn my back. Please notify Arkansas authorities immediately if you encounter this man.


  • 8-Year-Old Boy Sues Parents

    An 8-year-old Minnesota boy is suing his parents in state Supreme Court, seeking damages for the grievous injuries sustained when he was thrown from his mom's SUV because of an improperly-buckled seat belt.  Teddy Harrison, now confined to a wheelchair after suffering brain damage from the injuries that occurred in 2001, is suing his parents, Amy and Ted Sr., in a lawsuit filed on Teddy's behalf by his grandmother.

    Teddy's parents are hoping they will lose the case, because that would hopefully force their insurance company to pony up on their $100,000 policy.

    Wait.  Is that my head exploding again?

    The fallout from this case could be enormous.  It "could make it easier for parents of injured children to collect from insurance companies in certain instances, but caregivers and insurers could find themselves facing financial responsibility if a child gets hurt while riding in an improperly installed car seat." And as many as 82% of car seats on the road today are improperly installed, often due to the confusing LATCH system, which was supposed to simplify installation.  In addition, "motorists involved in wrecks with child-carrying drivers could try to skirt financial responsibility by pointing to a parent's negligent car-seat use". 

    So what are we to make of this?  It looks like either way, it's a good time to check out your local car-seat inspection station, to ensure that you're not one of the 82%, or that your child doesn't become a statistic like Teddy and have to sue you one day. 



in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage