Police in Bangor, Maine, are going to be really really busy soon. That's because a new municipal law
has been passed there making it illegal to smoke in a vehicle when
children are present, joining statewide laws already in effect in
Louisiana and Arkansas and laws being considered elsewhere. Being a semi-militant ex-smoker myself, I
wholeheartedly agree that smoking around children is bad for them and
that people shouldn't do it, but also being something of a libertarian
I'm having a problem with there being a yet another law passed that
tells people yet again there is something they must not do.
Bangor City Councilor Patricia Blanchette said that "people who smoke with children present in the
confined space of a car or truck might as well be deliberately trying
to kill those children". Well, there's an inflammatory statement
(pun intended)! I hardly think the thousands of people who smoke
in their cars or homes with children present are attempting to kill
them, but is this really the way to go about protecting our children
from harm? Making smoking in your own car a primary offense (which means you can be pulled over and fined if a police officer simply sees
you smoking in your car with someone under 18 inside, not if you are
pulled over for some other offense) seems, well, draconian. Don't
people have choice any longer? Hey, if you want to shorten your
own life and that of your kids, shouldn't that be okay? Or should
it? Who gets to decide this?
I tell you, I'm really having a problem with this
issue. I truly dislike smoking and don't want to be around smoke
and I especially don't want anyone smoking around my children; however,
I believe so fiercely in free choice and resisting government
intervention that I have to say I have real trouble with this law and
laws like them. What about you? Where do you draw the line
in cases like this? What's YOUR solution?