Strollerderby

Browse by Tags

(RSS)
  • Parents Blackmail Their Kids' School

    So Ray Abril Jr. High School won't win any awards for creativity. Is the name really so bad that parents have to blackmail their school to get it changed?

    A majority of parents in the Colton Joint Unified School District voted for the school board to name its new high school "Grand Terrace," but when the school board picked the name of a former school trustee (Abril) instead, they decided they'd boycott a state-mandated test to show their displeasure.

    Read More...


  • Girls From Single-Sex Schools Ace Tough Tests

    We’ve written about single sex education quite a bit here on the ‘Derby, both proand con –okay,the pro posts are usually me. And now there’s a British study to back me up – girls who attended all girl’s schools majorly outperformed their peers at coed schools. Nearly 73 percent of pupils in all-girls school scored A grades on their A-level math exams, an advanced test taken after thetopitnal final two years of high school (about ages 16-187). That figure was 64.9% for girls in coed schools. Other subject areas showed similar trends. Now, the article I read only concentrated in students at private schools versus those in regular public education, so it’s likely that issues of class probably play a big role. However, as someone who attended an all-girls high school, I have to say I think it does make a big difference in girl’s academic achievement. There are no distractions, no worries about buoys not liking you if you’re smarter than them, and no teachers assuming that if you are a girl you are automatically less serious and intelligent than similarly bright boys. My friends from my all-girls high school are an educated, accomplished group of women, and while we all have our issues with the school we went to (too focused on money and very, very unfair when it came to discipline), none of those issues would have made it better if boys were around. Looks like the same is true across the pond.

    Read More...


  • Want Smarter Kids? Get a Life.

    Heading out to celebrate St. Paddy's Day, and maybe feeling just a trifle guilty about leaving your precious angels behind?
    Well, you shouldn't, says a study by professors at the University of Sheffield. According to their research, kids whose parents had active social lives scored better on a standardized test than kids whose parents did not.

    Professors Sarah Brown and Karl Taylor looked at the social lives of 3000 parents, examining their memberships in resident's associations, sports clubs, volunteer organizations or church groups, and most importantly how many friends they had. That data was compared with their children's scores on standardized literacy, numeracy, and verbal tests. Those children whose parents had many connections and active social lives scored

    Read More...


  • Test Your Children Well

    The National Association of Head Teachers in the UK has issued a report calling for the National Curriculum tests, the British version of the No Child Left Behind regime, to be scrapped. The group fears that the continuous batteries of tests that have made their students (pupils, as they say) the most tested in the world, are putting undue pressure on the students and limiting the effectiveness of teaching. British students are given compulsory exams at ages 5, 7, 11, 14, 16, 17, and 18, with optional tests at 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 just for funsies. And you thought American students were testing their brains out.

    The NAHT would like the current system to be dumped in favor of a more informal process by which students are evaluated intermittently. Results would be communicated to parents instead of being published in tables. The group worries that teachers are simply teaching to the tests, and that students believe they are the only thing that matters in school. The general secretary of the group, Mick Brookes, told the Telegraph that, "Teaching to the test is having a disastrous effect on the curriculum and on children." Sue Palmer, an author who wrote a book about the British testing regime said, "I've spoken to many children who are convinced that their performance at the age of 11 on a batch of papers will determine their future chances of happiness." Despite the rigorous testing, the UK has dropped out of the top 10 rankings in math, reading, and science internationally.

    Read More...


  • Test Taking Ability Correlated With...Finger Length?

    baby birdWhen someone pulls out a ruler to measure a part of your body, do you start to feel inadequate? Now kids can share that pain. A recent study found that the finger length of kids between the ages of six and seven correlated with performance on standardized academic tests. Boys with short index fingers compared to their ring fingers did well on math tests, and girls with same-length index and ring fingers did well on verbal tests. No word yet on what my very long middle finger means, aside from the fact that other motorists seem to be bothered by it.

    The digit length is believed to be linked to hormones, which play a role in brain development. Testosterone purportedly influences mathematical and spatial ability, while estrogen is argued to affect the areas of the brain used in language. Finger length serves as a marker of prenatal hormone exposures, and potentially inborn academic abilities. Curse you, hormones! I blame everything on you.

    So instead of doing flash cards, this year we will be working on finger stretching. Because I want my child to have the brightest possible future at Harvard.  



in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage