Strollerderby : second hand smoke

Camel Makes New Cigarettes that Look and Taste Like Candy--Marketed to Kids?

Cole Gamble — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:02:00 GMT

The debate over whether tobacco companies market to kids has waged for decades. Now it would appear Camel has invented cigarette candy. Being test marketed in my hometown of Portland (sweet!), new Orbs Dissolvable Tobacco is pellets of what R.J. Reynolds calls dissolvable tobacco and look like a candy mint.

Surely this won’t piss anyone off.

To be fair, nicotine lovers have the right to enjoy the stuff in any form they like as long as it doesn’t hurt others. Orbs would make it easier for those folks to enjoy a nic hit socially. But c’mon. It’s packaged just like chewing gum. R.J. Reynolds is going to catch a lot of hell.

More by this author:

10 Things I Learned about Poop from My Son

Musical SpongeBob Rectal Thermometer. Fun for Your Kid’s Butt?

The Most Awesomely Epic High School English Paper of All Time

Should Smoking Be Banned In Cars With Kids?

Brett Singer — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:00:00 GMT

So. We have third-hand smoke. It's bad. And so on. More fuel for anti-smoking activists. And when someone says, "We're protecting helpless children!" that makes it harder to argue that they are intruding into our personal lives. Right?

A town in Washington State (can't ban smoking in D.C. – Obama's a smoker!) is considering a bill that would ban smoking in cars with children.
From the AP: "A member of the Tobacco Advisory Board of Pierce County, Leonard Sanderson, told The Olympian the proposal would make it a secondary offense, meaning smoking drivers could be ticketed if they were pulled over for another offense, such as speeding."

I was surprised to learn that California, Arkansas, Louisiana and Maine have all made smoking in cars that have kids in them against the law.

Here's the problem. There's no doubt that smoking around children is bad for their health. I get it. But unless you make smoking illegal (not gonna happen), how is this not a privacy violation? You can't drink and drive, but that's all the time, not just around children. Talking on a cell phone while driving has been deemed dangerous, so most states have laws that say you have to wear a headset. Driving without a seatbelt is dangerous, so if you don't wear a seatbelt, you get a ticket. And so on. None of those laws, however, are specific to children.

Does the law apply to your own children? What about other people's kids? Can you smoke in the car when there are no kids there? Now that we know about third-hand smoke, won't the little tykes be at risk anyway if they ride in a car that was, at one time or another, smoked in? And at what age is it safe to be exposed to second-hand smoke?

And how about bacon, or other smoked meats? Those aren't good for children, right? I mean, come on.

(In case you were wondering, most of that was me going off the deep end for comic effect. Thank you. Tip your waitresses.)

I think it would be great if nobody smoked. It's unhealthy, creates enormous costs for health insurers as those smokers age, and there's the second-hand, third-hand, and fourth-hand (just wait, it'll happen) smoke to contend with. It's a bad habit. But it's still legal. Until it isn't, this seems like an unreasonable law, like the one about smokers not being allowed foster children (which, considering that some kids are writing letters to woo potential foster parents, seems like an unfair restriction).

What do you think? Is this too much of an invasion of privacy? Or does it not matter if it's to "protect our children"?

Source: AP via nwsource.com

Image: Church Times

On Jett Travolta, Howard Stern Gets It Right

Grieving Chinese Parents Not Allowed To Sue

They Say -- Kids Who Skip Breakfast and Hate Mom Have Sex Sooner

They Say -- Vaccines Work

Newbery Winners Decrease in Diversity in Recent Years

Kid Woos Prospective Foster Parents With Letters

Third Hand Smoke Can Harm Your Kids

Brett Singer — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:00:00 GMT

Do you smoke, or do you know someone who smokes? Do you think your kids will be OK as long as they don't smoke around them?

Well, you're wrong.

Everyone knows about second-hand smoke. It's easy to avoid – just don't spend time with smokers when they are, in fact, smoking. However, there's a new danger – third-hand smoke. This new term, coined by doctors from Boston's MassGeneral Hospital for Children, describes, "the invisible yet toxic brew of gases and particles clinging to smokers’ hair and clothing, not to mention cushions and carpeting, that lingers long after smoke has cleared from a room."

And it gets even more fun: "The residue includes heavy metals, carcinogens and even radioactive materials that young children can get on their hands and ingest, especially if they’re crawling or playing on the floor." Cuz kids never play on the floor.

Dr. Philip Landrigan of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York added, "simply closing the kitchen door to take a smoke is not protecting the kids from the effects of that smoke." See, that much I think people knew. But that gross lingering scent that clings to your clothes and hair after you spend time at a bar that still allows people to puff away freely? Who knew that was dangerous too?

So what to do? Avoid smokers? Avoid rooms where smokers have been? Don't go anywhere that smokers congregate? Live in a literal bubble?

I've found that avoiding smoke is fairly easy, but I do know people who smoke. And they smell like it. The fact that's more than just gross might make me think twice before I let them in my house to sit on my furniture. That should be a fun conversation.

Source: NYTimes

Image: MSNBC

Who Buys The Baby Products In Your House?

They Say -- Kids Who Skip Breakfast and Hate Mom Have Sex Sooner

They Say -- Vaccines Work

Grieving Chinese Parents Not Allowed To Sue

Cigarettes Are Even Worse for Kids Than We Thought

Hannah Tennant-Moore — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 22:30:00 GMT

And yet again experts have found that smoking cigarettes is bad for you and everyone around you. Researchers have identified a little known nicotine threat they're calling third-hand smoke: the toxins left behind in a smoker's hair, clothes, and environment long after they've put out their cigarette.

It's particularly important that smokers with kids know about this new threat, since common wisdom has long held that parents can smoke outside or in the car if their kids aren't around. It turns out that the carcinogenic residue left behind by cigarettes can be ingested by babies and children who have never been exposed to second-hand smoke.

Here are just a few of the toxins found in third-hand smoke: carbon monoxide, lead, and arsenic. Probably not stuff you'd like your kids to be ingesting.

Photo: ABC News

Third Hand Smoke Can Harm Your Kids

More Pregnant Women in Developing Countries are Smoking

Brett Singer — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:00:00 GMT

Here's a stat to depress the heck out of you: in some developing countries, more than 3/4 of pregnant women have tried cigarettes.

Reuters reports on a study released by the National Cancer Institute's Tobacco Control Research Branch. 8,000 women in countries such as Argentina and Uruguay were interviewed. The findings were less than encouraging. In the past, about 9 percent of pregnant women surveyed were smokers. Now that number is 18 percent. It is possible that this number could be skewed by the 75% of women in Argentina who had "tried" smoking, and 78% in Uruguay. And that's not all: "Smokeless tobacco was used by a third of the women in the Indian state of Orissa," that means chaw. In Pakistan, second-hand smoke is the big problem, although it's also a problem in Brazil and other sites included in the study.

As a former nicotine nut, I just can't imagine puffing around my kids. Of course, I quit well before fatherhood, and the culture of the country was moving heavily in the direction of non-smokers: I finally managed to kick the habit when taxes pushed the price of a pack to two dollars (this was not, you might say, last Tuesday), and the college I was at made a rule that you had to be 50 feet from a building in order to light up. I realized that it was not actually possible to do this since the school is on an urban campus. If societal norms had stayed smoker-friendly (see Mad Men for a view of that hazy time in our nation's history), I don't know that I would have quit so quickly.

Update: for a related post, check out Madeline Holler's take on smoking in movies, which is in response to Eric Alterman's post on MediaMatters. Alterman is upset that a film he took two 9 year olds to "glorified" cigarette smoking. The film, however, is PG-13, which kind of puts an enormous gaping hole in his argument.

image: Archive.org