http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2008/10/23/should-directv-go-around-reincarnating-dead-child-stars.aspxWe&#39;re all familiar with those clever movie-related commercials DirecTV runs on television, the ones that take a famous scene from a film like &quot;Aliens&quot; or &quot;Back to the Future&quot; and turn the characters into shills for satellite televisionenCommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2008/10/23/should-directv-go-around-reincarnating-dead-child-stars.aspx#139542Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:38:41 GMT42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:139542Dad<p>Yeah, uhm, not sure it really matters if the mother approved it or not.. I believe the clip belongs to the company that made the movie, and they really could have done anything they wanted with it. I believe the &quot;getting approval from the mother&quot; was just a nice gesture.</p> <p>Besides, what's the difference between this and using a clip of a dead adult? You may say they are exploiting the child, but that could be said about letting children act in movies in the first place...</p> <img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=139542" width="1" height="1">http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2008/10/23/should-directv-go-around-reincarnating-dead-child-stars.aspx#139482Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:50:50 GMT42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:139482Shannon<p>I've seen a lot on this topic. I think it would've been different if she was doing the ad, but her part is just as it is in the film. What's the difference between this and the movie rerunning all the time? </p> <img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=139482" width="1" height="1">