<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.babble.com/CS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Should Some Baby Names Just Be Retired?</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2008/12/01/should-some-baby-names-just-be-retired.aspx</link><description>For those of you following my own personal baby naming drama , an update: we&amp;#39;re all set. Sort of. My husband and I still can&amp;#39;t agree on which of the boy names should be the first name and which one should go in the middle. But, you know, at least</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator><item><title>re: Should Some Baby Names Just Be Retired?</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2008/12/01/should-some-baby-names-just-be-retired.aspx#151548</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:37:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:151548</guid><dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;All it takes is one coup to ruin a good baby name.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=151548" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Should Some Baby Names Just Be Retired?</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2008/12/01/should-some-baby-names-just-be-retired.aspx#151512</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:23:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:151512</guid><dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, what a great topic! I just went back and read your linked article. I never wanted to be one of those last-minute-baby-namers who had to meet their child (ROLL EYES) so we had a name all picked out for our son or daughter. For sure our boy was going to be Roderick Jon....he was born and after I held him and looked over at my husband holding him I was struck by the absolute fact that the baby's name was Timothy David. That wasn't even one of our considerations so I don't know where it came from. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To this day, at 25 years old, he is still &amp;nbsp;Timothy David. A couple years ago after hearing his baby name story he actually sent me a formal thank you note for not naming him Roderick (which I still like...). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Funny subject eh!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=151512" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Should Some Baby Names Just Be Retired?</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2008/12/01/should-some-baby-names-just-be-retired.aspx#151492</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:38:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:151492</guid><dc:creator>CoolAuntieTina</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My grandfather was named Benedetto after Mussolini. The family lore says every kid named after him at that time was given a new pair of shoes. Well, decades later, we named our son Benedetto (Benny) after Grandpa...so I guess that means we're fascists? :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=151492" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>