<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.babble.com/CS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Father's Rights: Part I</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/01/03/father-s-rights-special-rights.aspx</link><description>According to John Fowler , Fathers 4 Justice Board Member and activist, one of his group's primary goals is "to promote equality in family courts." The organization's tagline reads "every father is a superhero to his children" which is fitting, given</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator><item><title>Dads Rule: New Data Tells Us Fathers Matter (A Lot)</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/01/03/father-s-rights-special-rights.aspx#7662</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:09:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:7662</guid><dc:creator>Strollerderby</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok so we know sometimes dads get a bum wrap. We've heard them take note of their minority status in the&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7662" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Father's Rights: Part I</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/01/03/father-s-rights-special-rights.aspx#1912</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:43:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:1912</guid><dc:creator>biologyfool</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How does this issue just relate to parents that have children the natural way (what you called biological)? &amp;nbsp;I'd say it relates to legal parents of which adoptive parents are certainly included.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just think you've missed the point with your comment about mothers being more attached because they went through &amp;quot;pregnancy, delivery, hormones, [and] breastfeeding.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;Adopted children attach to their mothers and fathers just as well as their non-adopted counterparts. &amp;nbsp;So if that's the case, then I don't see how your argument for a stronger mother-child bond is strengthened by the argument that it's natural.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Brian&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://onthefly.wordpress.com"&gt;http://onthefly.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1912" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Father's Rights: Part I</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/01/03/father-s-rights-special-rights.aspx#1847</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:55:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:1847</guid><dc:creator>Rachael Brownell (Redsy)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Biology fool,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clearly, this issue as discussed here relates to biological parents, but I think the issues of attachment and separation are equally crucial for adopted children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1847" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Father's Rights: Part I</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/01/03/father-s-rights-special-rights.aspx#1825</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:04:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:1825</guid><dc:creator>biologyfool</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;...the mother-child bond is undeniably biological in the beginning: Think pregnancy, delivery, hormones, breastfeeding.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So then adopted children can stay with their fathers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1825" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Father's Rights: Part I</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/01/03/father-s-rights-special-rights.aspx#1816</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:48:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:1816</guid><dc:creator>Rahab</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Consider that since 1970 the divorce rate has skyricketed. You are really comparing apples and oranges when you use statistics form a time when divorce occured in less than 5% of all marriages. Today 70% of divorces are initiated by women. So a man could get married, be a good dad and have is wife decide she is bored and the courts will remove his children from his care through no fault of his own other than not being the perfect husband and anticipating her evey whim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fathers are necessary. 85% of all prison inmates have one thing in common: They had no father in their home growing up. Could it be that the mere daily presence of a father is even more important than that of the mother?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the law is misandrist and kind of proves that feminists lie when they claim they want equal rights. need more proof? The VAWA is terrifyingly misandrist. Absolutley terrifying and often used to deprive a man of the right to see his children based soley on her allegation of violence - absolutely no proof required.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1816" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>