http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/06/18/pureed-baby-food-unnatural-and-unnecessary-according-to-uk-scientists.aspxBritish research says feeding babies pureed baby food could cause health problems later in life, and that, in keeping with the World Health Organization's recommendations, babies should be fed only breastmilk or formula for the first six months of lifeenCommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/06/18/pureed-baby-food-unnatural-and-unnecessary-according-to-uk-scientists.aspx#26837Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:53:23 GMT42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:26837Kin<p>My kids definitely fit this mould, although some kids aren't ready for solids at 6 months either,</p> <p>My 2nd went from exclusively formula to lamb chops &amp; veg in 3 days at nearly 11 months. She gave up formula completely at 11.5 months and was on 4 meals a day.</p> <p>Kids are ready when they're ready.</p> <img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=26837" width="1" height="1">http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/06/18/pureed-baby-food-unnatural-and-unnecessary-according-to-uk-scientists.aspx#26754Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:27:21 GMT42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:26754JulieT<p>Hear, hear. My first daughter was hungry all the time at 4.5 months, so matter how much she nursed, and anyone could see she desperately wanted some of this food she saw us eating. We started her with purees, and she loved them, and was on to solids at 6 months.</p> <p>My second wasn't interested in anything but nursing until she was 6 months, but she couldn't have handled solids then--no teeth at all!</p> <img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=26754" width="1" height="1">