<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.babble.com/CS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>States Turn Down Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Funds In Favor of Teaching, You Know, Actual Sex Ed</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/12/16/states-turn-down-abstinence-only-sex-ed-funds-in-favor-of-teaching-you-know-actual-sex-ed.aspx</link><description>Federal money for Cold Showers 101 may someday be a thing of the past. More and more states are declaring they will not apply for federal funding for abstinence-only sex education programs , and a couple others have applied but stated they will not stick</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator><item><title>re: States Turn Down Abstinence-Only Sex Ed Funds In Favor of Teaching, You Know, Actual Sex Ed</title><link>http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/12/16/states-turn-down-abstinence-only-sex-ed-funds-in-favor-of-teaching-you-know-actual-sex-ed.aspx#59204</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:29:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42a08a39-daf3-4129-8a63-8a27b879cc03:59204</guid><dc:creator>Abel D.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In my day there was no need to teach sex education in our schools. &amp;nbsp;That's why manufacturers designed all automobiles with back seats.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.babble.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=59204" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>