feedback for "To Each His Own"

  1. I am the mother of two bio and one adopted kid.  Yes, it is true that our relationships with each child are unique. It has NOT been my experience, however that there is a greater love or bond to the bio kids.  It is disturbing and annoying to me that you disregard that statement as false - a lie made to put all of my kids on a level playing field.  It is possible, even likely, that there are people out there that actually do not think like you do.  Just because you were never able to bond with a stepchild does not give you a profound wisdom that encompasses all parent child relationships.  Adoption is truly something you are either called to or not.  There are many people I have met who have told me they could never adopt a child, and I respect that.  There are many, myself included, who had an adoption in their future plans from a very young age and it is as natural to them as can be.  It is obvious you are not one who was called to adoption or step parenting, and it is likely that the e-mails you received from adoptees had adoptive parents like yourself who were just never able to fully accept the non-biological child.  I am always open to hearing / reading the experiences of others, but it is just that - YOUR experience.  I am endlessly annoyed by those who proclaim their truth is Gospel and any views in opposition to their Gospel is just an un-enlightened individual lying to themselves and the world.  I encourage honesty and sharing our insights and experiences, but DO NOT impose them on me.

    posted by : MamaToThree on 6/18/2007 at 10:05 AM Flag For Abuse

  2. I'll admit I was rattled by the headline, assuming you were going to write about a biological child and and adopted child.  I'll admit I was relieved when I discovered that you were discussing a biological child and a step-child.  To me a step-child and an adopted child are entirely different - of course this all depends on many circumstances.    However, I would assume that along with stepchildren comes at least a little bit of baggage regarding the other parent (i.e. the woman who bore the child and who made love to your current husband/partner and was at one time the focus of his affection.)  So a product of what was once romantic/sexual love between your guy and someone else might cause even the tiniest bit of anxiety in one's heart, I am thinking.  God knows enough of us bristle at the sight of our partners' exes even if no progeny came from the relationship!!  A child would (to me) be a constant reminder.  Not that I would not come to love and care for the child, but it would always be HER child.   Choosing to adopt a child - whether or not you even know who the bio. parents are - is different.  You are becoming the child's parents - their mom and dad.  Not their stepmom/stepdad.  There is not another woman (or man) lurking out there somewhere.  This child - in most cases - was not created by your spouse/partner and his/her ex.  This child, like one who comes from your own uterus, is getting a new start - a fresh opportunity for love, affection and nurturing - from YOU.    I am afraid I am not being very articulate, but I beg to differ when I read a comparison being drawn between a stepchild and an adopted child.  Brady Bunch aside, the stepchild is not yours.  Most stepchildren I know call their stepmom/dad by their first name and readily acknowledge that their "real" mom/dad lives elsewhere, is dead, whatever.  The adopted child is your child;  you are  MOM or DAD.  And any MOM or DAD worth her/his weight in anything would lay down her/his life for her/his child -regardless of its biological origins.

    posted by : BBBGMOM on 6/18/2007 at 11:59 AM Flag For Abuse

  3. You are missing the while point -- "co-parenting" a child that you have not adopted or given birth to is in no way the same as adopting and parenting that child.  True, parents love all their children differently, but what does it say to a child that you have a significant relationship with that you would not "die" for him or her as you would a bio child?  That's just shorthand for , "I don't love you as much."  Pretty hurtful, I say.   And one commenter thinks stepchildren are different?  Please don't tell my two stepdaughters that.  Of course, they're "different," but that doesn't mean they don't occupy a special place in my heart and that I wouldn't do a whole host of things for them.   Love for any two people can never be the "same," but haven't adoptive families taken it on the chin enough with the media mocking Angelina and Madonna and Meg?   The thing that riles me the most about the attention that you have received for your book and your comments about adoptive families is that is just buys in to the stigma that adoptive families have been fighting for a long time -- we're not the "same," so we're not good enough.

    posted by : PunditMom on 6/18/2007 at 7:05 PM Flag For Abuse

  4. It's really a terrible position Rebecca Walker puts adoptive parents in, having to defend the depth of their love for their children.  Jeez. 

    The thing is, a person can only speak for herself.  And yet.  Walker feels she is entitled to make these sweeping claims about love and what all parents feel.   Frankly,  it's nonsense.

    I was a nanny and have been a preschool teacher for many years.  I loved all the kids in my charge very dearly.  But when my husband and I adopted our daughter, I fell in love with her with the most intense, protective, overwhelming love I could ever have imagined.  It made me realize that what I felt for the children I cared for was not parental love at all.  I would absolutely with no question die for my daughter.  In a heartbeat. 

    For Walker to claim that her argument holds up because of what adoptive and step children think is also absurd.  Of course, if you talk to children, they will see things differently!  Parental love is certainly different to the love children feel for their parents.  Walker has made it pretty clear that she's not particularly close to her biological mother. 

    It just pisses me off that I have to convince others of the love I feel for my child.  Thanks a million, Rebecca!




    posted by : BklynMama on 6/18/2007 at 7:06 PM Flag For Abuse

  5. I think this article is fantastic, but I think a lot of people are missing the point.  From what I can see, it's not about biological versus non-biological kids as much as it's about different kinds of love - and THAT is completely understandable.  The way you love someone is so utterly personal to that relationship.  It seems like the whole "I love my biological son more" thing is kind of a hook to get people reading and discussing, when the gist is "I love him differently".

    Of course, I don't have any adopted children, and my stepson and I don't get along or like each other very much at all, so I'm coming at it from a different point of view from all the other commenters. 

    posted by : superblondgirl on 6/18/2007 at 7:19 PM Flag For Abuse

  6. This is a very interesting topic. I am actually all three if you want to break it down. I have one step-son, three biological sons, and two adopted daughters. So I think I have an interesting take on this.

    I wrote about my own story of being a step-child last year. It was titled, "I was a Stepchild." It explains how I went into my relationship with my husband and "our" first son. Yes, I have six children. I changed his diapers, helped potty train him, took him to school, and his mom and I both attended "mommy's day" for Kindergarten. He is my first son. Do I understand him as well as the three boys that followed him? No. He is definitely his mothers son. They share a very special bond, as they should. Is it easy? No. But being a mom never is.

    As for the three that were ripped out of my body? They drive me crazy. Why? Because they are too much like me. All my flaws are mirrored right straight at me. What a beautiful thing this parenting gig is. But even though they are SO much alike, they are different in their own crazy ways.

    The girls? Well, I am not sure how I got so lucky. They are the two most gorgeous Guatemalans you will ever see. They are so beautiful and my eldest is as smart as a whip. The funny thing is I can't take any credit for it. They are not from my gene pool. Thank goodness though. I already know what it is like to live with my own devil spawns. Do I love them them just the same? No. Not at all. But I believe it is because they are girls. They are a different animal.  I am still just  trying to figure out the whole hair and accessory thing.

    I love all these little people that are running around my house. Too much I think. I love them all equally, but differently. They all are so very special in their own individual ways. That is what being a mom is all about. Acceptance and love. It doesn't matter what uterus they came out of. As long as you accept them for who they are, not where they came from, things can work out A-O-K.
     
    By the way, they all drive me equally crazy too. But isn't that how it's suppose to be?

    posted by : HeadMutha on 6/18/2007 at 7:27 PM Flag For Abuse

  7. I am coming from a completely different angle here.  I am a person who was adopted but always knew my biological parents as well.  My biological connection certainly has never made me love them like I loved my parents who actually raised me.  They are the ones who helped me through rough times, knew all my quirks and showed me unconditional love.

    If the author was receiving emails from adopted children who were applauding her writing about the love being different, they were probably ones who had longed to find out who their biological parents were, not ones who actually had a relationship with their bio parents.  I know that friends who have been adopted and didn't know their bio parents always felt like there was something they didn't know about themselves.  That's what drove them to want to meet their bio parents.  In my opinion, all you find out is that your dad had acne and that's where you got that from... and your mom has big hips... that's where you got that from.... etc etc...   Anyway, my point is, biology has nothing to do with how much you love someone. 

    posted by : tiffer on 6/19/2007 at 8:11 AM Flag For Abuse

  8. It's interesting to me that so many people are responding as passionately as they are -- i simply read Walker to be saying that there is a difference between these forms of love. A case can be made that the love one feels for an adopted child or step child is more genuinely altruistic because the self-interest of perpetuating one's genetic lineage is not present.

    posted by : chattydaddy on 6/19/2007 at 5:20 PM Flag For Abuse

  9. Headmutha wrote: "It doesn't matter what uterus they came out of. As long as you accept them for who they are, not where they came from, things can work out A-O-K."   And loving those children means that you understand that it matters now and for the rest of their lives which uterus they came out of. Accepting where they came from IS IMPORTANT. You have no idea if things will work out A-O-K . You are raising children that already have a mother and a father. You may be the best caregiver in the wold - but you're not these children's mother - and acting like only your love matters is beyond selfish.   What if you got amnisia and ended up with stragers who said, we love you and that's all that matters and everything will be A-O-K....would you accept that, or would you want to know who you are and where you came from?? Would you want to see the people who were your family before amnsia? Or is love enough....

    posted by : Adoptee on 6/20/2007 at 6:43 AM Flag For Abuse

  10. From an evolutionary perspective one of the amazing things that humans are able to do is take love between relatives and extend it to the tribe, and then go a step further and extend love of fellow tribe members to all other humans. Robert Wright's book Nonzero -- which is exceptional, i highly recommend it -- describes this long evolutionary path. Compared with other mammals, our ability to apply love for relatives to non-relatives is extraordinary.

    That said, we are our biology much more than we would like to think, and i believe that studies show that parents abuse step-children more frequently than their own children. This is not surprising -- though we as as a species transcend many fundamental rules of biology much of the time, there is (in my opinion) a blood is thicker than water factor. At the end of the day we are programmed to protect our genetic legacy with a passion and tenacity that probably exceeds what *most people* can sustain with non-relatives.

    Of course parents who adopt are not most people -- it seems to me that adoption selects for an unusually generous and kind collection of people. I would guess (speaking without experience) that the average parent who adopts is more kind and loving to their adopted child than the average parent, just because they are such a giving and loving collection of people. But we should never been afraid of science or be afraid of talking about differences between forms of love or biology -- that is a response based on fear that does not help anyone, in my opinion.

    posted by : chattydaddy on 6/20/2007 at 10:12 AM Flag For Abuse

  11. As an adoptive mom I started to read this article with my dander already up.  "I hope my daughter never reads this ..." I thought.  But what I think is the key to this piece is the line "re-inscribing biological love as the ultimate standard."  My two children are very different and I spent a lot of the first two years with my adopted daughter feeling like I had done something wrong ... that because of her difficult personality, I wasn't loving her the "right" way.  Then I realized one day  that I was doing just what Ms. Walker speaks of -- I was using the love I have for my birth-daughter as the ultimate standard.  I was telling myself I should feel the same type of love for both kids, when really I just love them differently ... but I love them both the same amount and with equal adoration.  I would wade through those crocodiles for both my kids.  If either one cries in a crowded room I respond with the same immediacy and concern.  I just do it differently for each of them.  I think what the author is saying here is to embrace that, talk about loving your kids for who they are, not gauge things by saying the love for a birth-child is the "best" kind of love (whether consciously or unconsciously) and therefore how we should measure our love for adotped/step/foster kids.

    posted by : lissawriter on 6/21/2007 at 10:32 AM Flag For Abuse

  12.  "I was telling myself I should feel the same type of love for both kids, when really I just love them differently ... but I love them both the same amount and with equal adoration."   Question: when you see characterisitcs develop in these kids, do thoughts of their mother and father pop into your head - as in who they may look like, their personalities, body-types, temperamants, talents and so on?   Alos, what exaclty is the love you felt for your birth-daughter - can you describe that feeling? How was/is it different from the love for the adopted kids?

    posted by : Adoptee on 6/21/2007 at 8:27 PM Flag For Abuse

  13. I think about my adopted daughter's birth-parents a lot and wonder about them; what aspects of my little girl are most like them in both physical and mental ways.  I feel a lot of love and respect for them -- and I have a special responsibility to parent their daughter as best I can.  She is my daughter ... but they are her birth-parents, something I can't ever be.  Since she was born in China there is very little chance we'll ever be able to find her birth-parents, and that saddens me a great deal.  I hope someday there's a way we can find them -- if it's what she would like to do.  I won't force it if she's ambivalent, but will fully support any efforts she makes to find them when she's of age.  We sometimes talk about her birth-parents and I'll say things like, "I wonder if your birth-mother has your laugh ..." and "I bet you have a smile like your birth-father ..." Because I want her to know it's okay to talk about them, love them, and miss them, even though she doesn't remember them ... and even if it hurts my heart a bit.  Since my birth-daughter is older, I only knew the motherly love I felt for her when my youngest came along.  I don't really know how to describe what I feel for my birth-daughter, but what I know is that it is absolutely the same type of love I have for my adopted daughter.  They're just two different beings who need different (in a good sense of the word "different") ways of loving.  I'm not sure if that makes sense or helps! :)  I don't think it's an issue of mothering an adoptee 'vs' a biological child either, it's just that they are unique kids and I love them for who they are.  My sister and I are very different and came out of the same womb.  I know my mother loves my sister and me differently but with the equal amount of love.  We are her daughters and she loves us as a mother loves, unconditionally.  The same goes for my kids -- I adore them equally and love them differently because of their own beautifully unique personalities.

    posted by : lissawriter on 6/21/2007 at 10:11 PM Flag For Abuse

  14. Thanks for sharing, Lissawriter. Maybe it's not possible for a mother to define that "feeling".   I was adopted and raised with  aparents' three bio kids, and I don't think there was a difference in the way a-mother loved me, rather the different kind of bond that bio families share. Maybe for the adoptee it is more evident, because the adoptee is the one who is different and not able to share genetic similarities etc. I find it painful being in the same room with the whole adoptive family - it's too much of "them" and their genetic energy - I sometimes experience a sort of out-of-body feeling - no one knows it's happening, as I have always tried to blend in no matter where I am.   When I'm with my family (reunited for 11 years) I feel much more relaxed and comfortable about myself. I don't have to work at feeling like I belong - I just do. This is nature. We have similar appearance and personlaity traits - so when we're together, there's no feeling of not quite fitting in, or trying to fit in - it just is. I sometimes feel that I could leave my a-family and just live the rest of my life with my family - but I was raised with these people - there's a forty-year history that just can't be erased.

    posted by : Adoptee on 6/22/2007 at 6:25 AM Flag For Abuse

  15. Wow... Adoptee. That's very interesting. We have thought about adopting a child for our second child since we had complications with our first's birth. But I'm not sure I would want to, having read what you wrote.

    posted by : mcglory13 on 6/23/2007 at 6:09 PM Flag For Abuse

  16. mcglory, when I was growing up I would hear people say, "If I couldn't have my own kids, I would adopt." It never sat right with me, I didn't know why, but my head would start spinning and I would have to walk away. Like there is a shopping mall full of mothers waiting to hand over their babies to others.   Now I know why....adoption is viewed as an option for creating a family. But, adoption can only happen through others' extreme misfortune - a mother and father who lose their child - a child who loses their mother and father. So, when people say they want to adopt, whether to have a family or add to one, it's like my loss, and my family's loss means nothing.   In the Baby Scoop Era (1950s - 1973) mothers were forced to surrender their babies for adoption - because (most) got pregnant out of wedlock - it was those women's parents who adopted us out, not our mothers.   For the adoptee: our parents were taken from us, our names changed, and the original one sealed (by law). Adoptees were forced to be the children of strangers - different parents, different ethnic background, different realtives etc. As much as people told me I should be happy about being adopted, my inner-voice was always rebelling against it. I  could not understand why people thought I should be happy because I was adopted - it didn't make sense. But I played the game, I went along with it not make other people unhappy, which caused more anxiety and more pain.   Adoption is marketed as a way to create a family - I think this is wrong; children have families - and because adoption is a 1.44 billion dollar a year industry, mothers are coerced and manipulated into surrendering their babies for adoption. Children in orphanages have families (even an "abandoned" child has a family, somewhere, and because a mother or father couldn't keep their child there is an assumption the child wasn't wanted - when, really, is rarely the choice of the mother). I never hear of adoptive parents trying to to talk to or locate the child's parents before they adopt, to make sure cisrcumstances haven't changed - that this is really what the mother wants. Once the adoption papers are signed, the separation is a done deal.     Adoption is separating families - it's tragic, and I wish more people would put an effort into helping the families keep their children instead of taking them to create or build on an existing one. I lost my mother, father, siblings, ethnicity, ancestry and relatives to the system of adoption. I never needed to be taken from my mother - she needed help, not have her child taken from her.   There are children living in unsafe environments - older children and children who need extra care. I would hope that people would consider helping these children in the form of legal gurdianship. And these kids, despite their parent's situation and background, still have an identity and family - and that family will always be very alive for them

    posted by : Adoptee on 6/24/2007 at 8:01 AM Flag For Abuse

  17. Adoptee -- thanks for sharing. Have you spoken with many other people who were adopted? do you think your experience is typical or atypical? i have had a few adopted friends of the years and i have never heard this. A desire to be with one's biological family seems quite natural, and a certain feeling of displacement also seems natural, but i would think many adoption scenarios would be much better environments for children than the alternative.

    Steven Levitt, the author of Freakonomics, studied the dramatic reduction in crime in new york city in the last few decades and concluded -- with pretty overwhelming evidence -- that the reason homicide and other forms of crime dropped so dramatically is that abortion was made legal (i think in the 70s). In other words, children who are born to families who are unable to care for them, or would prefer not to care for them, have a much of higher incidence of ending up committing crime. I have to think that if adoption were ended tomorrow, you would see both the rate of abortion increase and perhaps also the rate of crime. And I have to think that many of those bio-family environments (of parents who wanted to give away their children for adoption but could not) would be very unhappy places for the children.

    My experience as a young parent suggests that even if you are thrilled to have children, have money for help, and everything else is right, it can be a very challenging experience. If you are not ready and things are not right, and sure it can be a very damaging environment for the child.

    I know nothing about the experience of being adopted, which i am sure has many challenges, but imagining a world in which adoption did not exist seems like an unhappy thought experiment. And I worry that your comments above may have the effect of discourage loving parents from adopting children who would otherwise have a much harder, and perhaps even less loving, childhood.

    posted by : chattydaddy on 6/28/2007 at 7:25 AM Flag For Abuse

  18. Thanks for your response, Chattydaddy.   Adoption has got to be on of the most difficult societal issues to explain. I am most definitely not alone with my thinking.   Many adoptees call it "coming out of the adoptee fog." Can imagine what it's like to grow up not knowing who your parents are? You know they are alive somewhere, but you aren't allowed to be with them?   You have children, right? Think what it would be like for them to grow up with strangers never knowing you or their mother. They wouldn't know what you look like, what your voice sounds like - how you celebrate your family customs and ethnicity or if you have similar personality traits. Imagine your children's grandparents never knowing their grandchildren...   For thirty years I was a compliant adoptee. Then one day, it hit me smack in the face: I lost my [identity] and family and it's against the law for me to know who they are! I was conditoned to believe I was adopted because I was loved but given away for a chance at a better life. How on earth can a child comprehend that statement? I was conditioned to believe that adoption was in my best interest - that I should be grateful and happy that I was adopted. No one ordered me to think this way....but that's what adoption can do. It's the most bizarre thing. Wanting to know one's parents is much more than a simple curiosity. Every fibre of my body wanted to be with my mother and father - but no one knew. Oh, I said things like, I love my adoptive parents, and I don't need to know where I come from.... it was a lie. I said it because I was terrified of being "sent back". Even though I had no idea where I would be sent back to -  my parents, I thought, must really not want me, because all my friends parents kept their kids. But not mine.     Adoption screws with the mind. I can't even describe what it felt like to meet my own mother when I was 35. The woman I had dreamed of and fantasized about for so many years. The woman who could finally help me put together my identity - the woman who's womb I grew in - the woman who was just like me. My reunion was wonderful, insane, terrifying and painful. It was two worlds colliding - two identities trying to understand the other. One never had the chance to develop, the other so confused it ran to get protection form the pain. Why was I denied my own mother? Why?     As far as adoption being abolished - the reality is that will never happen. There is a market for babies and human beings profit form the sale of babies. Supply and demand. Caring for other people's children (short-term and long-term) is of course needed, but to take a child from their people, (and sometimes homeland) rename them and not do everything humanly possible to locate a child's family is, in my opinion, wrong.            

    posted by : Adoptee on 6/29/2007 at 10:25 PM Flag For Abuse

  19. My experience as a young parent suggests that even if you are thrilled to have children, have money for help, and everything else is right, it can be a very challenging experience. If you are not ready and things are not right, and sure it can be a very damaging environment for the child.   To that I ask: where are the statictics that prove any child fairs better in an adoptive environment? Families have been struggling since the beginning of time....is separating children from families (permanently) the answer? People who adopt, in most cases, do so because they can not conceive children naturally. How does infertility determine the quaility of parenting? Just because someone wants a child does not mean a child will have a better life. Also, adopters tend to have more money than those who are losing their children to the adoption industry....but this does not mean that the mother or mother and father's circumstances wouldn't have changed had they been given time and support. People struggle, and others help -- the government should help - the community etc. Permanantly separating children and families can be just as if not more damaging than  a family who is struggling to keep their family together.   My adoptive mother talks about the days when her and her and my a-dad could barely find a dime to buy a loaf of bread (before I came to their home). He had polio, they had three (bio) kids to feed (one was an afterthought - not planned) - but they managed - they survived the struggles and went on to have a successful life. Should their children have been taken from them and adopted?   Every human being can experience difficult times...and to that reality, I pose the question: if you had to surrender a child for adoption because your life situation changed - how would you feel? Would you want people to help you or would you prefer your child be taken from you and adopted.    

    posted by : Adoptee on 6/30/2007 at 6:19 AM Flag For Abuse

  20. Thank you, Rebecca Walker, for saying "out loud" (and without guilt) what seems to be a taboo thought.  I'm a stepmom to a 13-year old and a bio mom to a 5 month-old.  I read the blurb and felt immediately at ease.  I met my stepson when he was 10; he is a charming, sweet, thoughtful and hilariously funny and clever young man.  I love him and feel that I have won the stepchild lottery--he likes me, even loves me, and I him. His mom and I are close- no drama, we do what's best for her child.  But he has really bad habits that are the result of post-divorce guilt and parents whose ideas of limits, boundaries and discipline are very different from mine.  I was a prisoner to this until we moved into a new house that was mine, when I felt empowered to exert some influence over how things would be in our house.  My husband and I have had many, many ugly fights about our differing views and the difficulty of helping to raise another woman's child.  My relationship with my stepson is that of an older friend who is also a parent, but I feel hamstrung by the fact that I'm asked to be a parent but not given all the tools in the parental toolbox.  Then I had my own baby, and the love I feel for him is so deep, so uncomplicated, and so protective that it's staggering.  Do I love my baby more than I do his half brother?  Of course--no contest there.  But my stepson has a mom who loves him in the same way that I love my bio son.  And I don't think that my stepson expects (or wants) it any other way.  As an older special friend, he confides in me things that he wouldn't tell his parents; I also have the privelidge of seeing him as he is, rather than through the parental lens of expectations, projections and regrets.  His mother is overly protective of him to the point that she limits him; I see him as a young man who can conquer anything, and I try to advocate on behalf of his independence.  Perhaps I'll end-up being overly-protective of my bio son, though I hope that he won't have to have a stepmom to see him as the capable, strong young man that his brother is.

    posted by : MDmom on 7/3/2007 at 8:45 AM Flag For Abuse

  21. Thank you,  Adoptee, for your continued candor and powerful story. I understand -- or at least can begin to understand -- why you are so vociferously against adoption. What seems broken about the system to me is the whole idea that there should not be communication between the adopted child and the biological parents. That seems like a completely misplaced and outdated idea, even though i gather it still exists. It seems to me that every child should have the right to seek out their biological parents, and that any loving, open-minded, parent who is adopting should support their adopted child in doing so. Indeed, the adopting mother above says as much.

    What I am not sure you take into consideration in your comments is the possibility that there are conditions under which adoption is the best alternative. Remember that in countries in which there is no system for adoption, babies are abandoned in the night by mother's who would sooner let their children die than take on the responsibility. Infanticide is also much more common than one would like to think in human history. Mothers have been leaving babies on church steps and elsewhere for thousand of years.

    I know parents who are considering adopting and they are loving people many of whom could have children but consider adoption to be a more generous path. They would fully support the child's interest in meeting their biological parents as soon as they are ready. Sadly, for many adopted children the alternative to adoption may not be growing up with the biological parents; it may be not growing up at all.



    posted by : chattydaddy on 7/8/2007 at 11:11 PM Flag For Abuse

  22. Chattydaddy, there is no such thing as biological parents - or, everyone has them not just adopted people. This creates confusion and a disconnect between a human bing and their people. Think about how that sounds....biological parents....like we were created in a lab for the purpose of adoption.   I have parents and adoptive parents. I wouldn't exist if it weren't for my mother, father and the generations of mothers and fathers before them. Adoption has this way if twisting reality and one's fundamental truths. If a child lost their parents in a car accident and someone else raised those kids, would their parents who died be referred to a their biological parents? No, it would be disrespectful. In adoption children lose their parents. That's why it's so frustrasting for many adoptees....their identity is built on fiction - they take on the identity of strangers and must form their own identity based on those people's ethnicity, family and hsitory. Adoption should not be used a way to "create a family" ....we have a family, an etnicity, an ancestry - just like non-adopted humans. What would be better is if people did everything possible to help us stay with our families. It's just not right expecting any human being to say good-bye to their family, culture and often homeland so others can use that child to create their own family.   Can you imagine how frustrating it is to not be able to answer questions about yourself? Two days ago I was at the eye doctor - he asked me if their is a history of Glaucoma in my family. My head began to hurt and felt like an alien (this has happened no less than one million times in my life where I was presneted with identity questions) and again I had to say, "I don't know . . . I'm adopted."   As far as babies/children being abandoned....it's not necessarily a mother's "choice". If we look at some of these countries and the amount of corruption and poverty, is it any wonder mothers and fathers are surrendering their children? But, does this mean they don't love or want their baby? Not at all. The word abandoned is also used as a way to take repsonsibility off of the adoption agency and adopters. My adoption papers say that I was abandoned (this is in NA)  - my mother lived five miles away  and was trying to get visits with me. There is much you could learn about the adoptin industry....there are baby factories, where women (mostly unwed or struggling financially - or sent by their parents) who are tricked into surrendering their babies for adoption. It's happening in the US, too.   Would I rather see a baby adopted than left for dead on a street? Of course I would - that's actually what adoption should be about. But's it's not - it's about selling babies and children by taking advantage of very vulnerable people.   I am also unsure of anyone who says they would rather adopt than have their own child. I don't undsertand this. Why? Is this some sort of heroic act? I would be more impressed with someone who did everything in their power to help a child stay with their family or at least raised in their homeland or with extended family. If this isn't possible, then of course....take a child into your home.   A few years ago I used to present to pre-adopters on what's it like to be adopted. Most were not interested in what I had to say, simply because they had an agenda - and that was to get a baby. I would ask them if they had tried to conceive naturally, and most had. I asked them why it was important to have their own child - the answer was always the same....they want a baby that comes form them - that is part of their DNA ...well, adoptees want the same thing - to be with the people who they come from and share the same DNA. We're human, too.            

    posted by : Adoptee on 7/13/2007 at 8:12 AM Flag For Abuse

  23. While I have no doubt of the outrage generated by Rebecca Walker's statement, I find the idea that adopted children swarmed her email in hordes, desperate to expess their gratitude a little unrealistic.

    posted by : kione on 5/26/2008 at 11:14 PM Flag For Abuse

  24. See I am I step-parent. My husband has a 5 and 6 year old from a previous relationship (they weren't married.) Even though the mother is not around, as she is married and has children of her own with her husband, she still calls from time to time and shows up to some of the kids' "bigger" moments in life. She came for her son's kindergarten graduation and the kids' Halloween parade. However, on the days that she is there or when she calls it's as if I don't exist. That all the work and effort that I put in for the kids to be where they are doesn't matter. I was the one that did homework with her son so he could get to first grade and I was the one that dealt with the crying and temper-tantrums her daughter threw in the middle of the mall because she wanted the perfect Halloween costume. And where is the gratitude for all the effort I put in for it? It's non-existent. My husband is convinced that I don't care for the kids at all because of the resentment I feel towards their mother. How does that even make sense? Yes I wish she would make up her mind that she would either be there ALL the time or NONE of the time. None of this "I'll call when I feel like it." or "Oh it's important I guess I'll show up." bull shit. Can I not get a "thank you" or "you're doing such a wonderful job"?????? The role of the step parent is so under appreciated. I'm currently pregnant with our first child., and I already feel a stronger connection with my own child than I do for both of his kids. Does that make me a horrible person? I know I'll love my child more than the other children simply because it is MY CHILD and NO ONE ELSE'S. I don't have to share the attention at his school plays or games or graduation. And that's simply because he is a product of my husband and myself and there will ALWAYS be a love there that I will never be able to feel for my husband's kids.

    posted by : Mariya Kruseck on 12/2/2009 at 4:37 PM Flag For Abuse


   
  
 
 
   


Click here to login and post feedback using your login name or
Post feedback anonymously using this alias :


New This Week


What's New on Babble

Daily Poll

Have you started your holiday shopping?