The Pink and the Blue
A new book looks at the gender divide between babies.
Boys are better in math, girls are more empathetic – there’s something almost alluring about the idea that our brains are wired differently. But in her new book, Pink Brain, Blue Brain, author and neuroscientist Lise Eliot synthesizes decades of research on the topic and concludes that both sexes – boys in particular – are suffering under our assumptions about their nature.
Our X and Y chromosomes really do seem to point us in different directions. From the beginning, girls are more resilient and faster to develop than boys. They get a head start in language and fine motor skills. By four months, girls make more eye contact (not surprisingly, women are found later to be more skilled at reading emotion). Boys are more fussy as babies and vulnerable throughout childhood. Their motor skills are on par with girls’, though, and they tend to do more jumping, running, and general stunt work than their female counterparts.
But according to Eliot, the biological differences between us are actually very small. Average skill levels vary slightly, but it’s nothing close to how much the sexes differ in height, for example. When it comes to abilities and personality traits, there is way more variation within each sex than there is between the sexes. And the overlap is huge, meaning lots of boys are more verbal than girls and lots of girls are more active than boys.
So how do we go from slight biological variations to a clear gender divide? It starts when our babies come home from the hospital to their sports-themed or doll-inhabited rooms. Despite their best intentions, moms and dads treat their little ones differently, with boys tending to get tossed in the air and rough-housed more and girls tending to be described by their parents as softer and more delicate. One study in Eliot’s book asked moms to judge how steep an incline their eleven-month-old could crawl down and showed that moms doubted the skill and courage of the girls and made the ramp steeper for the boys, even though both sexes were equally capable. Studies also show that parents (dads in particular) are less supportive when, for example, their boy cuddles a baby doll, than when he wields a lightsaber.
Our biases are hurting the boys in particular, says Eliot. They are more likely to be held back from kindergarten, or labeled with ADHD and learning disorders. We expect them to be slower and less focused, instead of challenging them and adapting our teaching methods. She gives a lot of suggestions to help boost boys’ communication and fine motor skills (two areas that have a big impact on school performance). For example, teach boys to type early; read non-fiction; and encourage cutting, stamping, and painting. Boys need more chatting and soothing and less “toughening up” – they require just as much help, if not more, understanding their feelings.
Girls have been on the rise for a while now, but math and science are still dominated by boys, partly because we assume that they have a natural advantage. In reality, boys only excel in visuospacial skill (the ability to mentally rotate an object), and girls actually tend to get better grades in both math and science. But the ladies fall off once they hit adolescence, which Eliot argues is because they get the message that hard-core math is not their turf and they lose confidence. Women are well represented in medicine (which has a human, helping side), but we still don’t have very many female aerospace engineers or computer scientists. Give Legos and Lincoln Logs to girls, says Eliot. They need balls and paper airplanes, jigsaw puzzles and tool sets. Get them onto the computer for some fast-paced targeting games to practice spatial reckoning and healthy competition.
There is no gene for garbage truck obsessions or tiaras and tutus, but if we only follow our children’s lead and never challenge them to step out of their comfort zones, guess what will happen? Our brains are remarkably “plastic,” meaning that they grow and strengthen based on our experiences. So imagine that your boy needs a lot of emotional support and that your girl might grow up to be a wacky math professor. “Whatever you do is what your brain will be ‘wired’ for,” says Eliot. “So anytime we see an obvious difference between men and women, or boys and girls, ask yourself: how did they spend their time over the past thirty years to make their brains so good – or bad – at certain skills?”








I agree there is a lot of gender bias in our schools. But I think a lot of it comes from their peers not just parents and teachers. Studies have shown that once a child begins attending school their peers have more influence over them than parents or teachers. As for boys starting school later I think that is just their natural physicality, and that is not a bad thing. Men have more muslce mass and as children are more active to build that needed mass. It is cruel to expect them to sit for hours on end when their genes are begging them to move more to survive.
This looks to be a great book. One of the things that has saddened me greatly since becoming a parent is seeing how much the gender divide has grown over the years. Everything is gendered, and expectations as to what each sex will wear and will play with are enforced by even total strangers. How have we managed to slip backwards so far so fast?Whenever a parent tells me that their two year old is “all boy” I shudder. Of course, your child’s train obsession must be a genetic trait, not a common boy & girl interest that is much more approved of in boys. Your child is active? Must be because they’re a boy. “Boys will be boys” etc. etc. etc. It’s hard to argue against well-cherished stereotypes, but we need to if we’re ever going to have true freedom and equality for our boys and our girls.
Great article, Heather! This ridiculous gender stereotyping is everywhere. Momversation recently did a bit about it and mothers of boys kept commenting that their boys hate dolls and love trucks (and so that is just how it is and they were certainly not encouraging gender stereotypes). I don’t have a boy. I don’t understand this need that so many mothers have to prove their son’s masculinity.
I have boy/girl twins who are 1 year old and let me tell you at play group alone people try to place gender stereotypes on them. If I was to stereotype them I would say my dd is the more daring, jumping head first off the couch while my ds is more “emotional” and loves to cuddle, he always has.
I try to get them gender neutral toys and surprisingly my dd does have a doll, but it wasn’t bought by me, and she usually has nothing to do with it. My ds is the one trying to give it kisses. But it is kinda hard for society to not stereotype considering you can’t buy girls clothes that aren’t pink and boys that aren’t blue.
why not buy the girls some boy clothes and the boys some girl clothes…
honestly, I have no trouble buying non-girly clothes for my 2 year old…and sometimes, I dress her in boy clothes…she does wear pink, though, sometimes, and its no big deal…it just doesn’t matter what they wear…she is bold and daring and prefers blocks and playdough and running to dolls…I think people make things out of the stuff that doesn’t matter and don’t pay attention to what DOES…*and* if you leave your child’s early development in the hands of a caregiver, then you’re really depending on them to set that tone of your child’s persona…something I would not entrust someone else with, ever
At my son’s (6 years old) swim class last summer there were 2 boys and 2 girls. During the lessons, I didn’t really see any difference between the boys versus the girls’ abillities. But, when it came time to jump off the diving board, with the teacher in the water and wearing life preservers, both of the mom’s of the girls refused to let their girls jump. Both moms of the boys (myself included!) said go for it. There really was no reason that the girls couldn’t do it, and both moms admitted that they themselves simply were not ready to let their girls try something that “scary”.
This is a subject of great interest to me. When I was a child, I always like typical “boy things” better than the girlie stuff. My mom wanted me to be more of a girlie girl, but my dad really encouraged me to be myself, and I always excelled in math and science. On top of that, I had a great math teacher in high school who actually challenged the girls more than the boys. At the time I thought it was unfair, but when I graduated she told me that most of the time people will think that girls can’t excel at math and science and will treat us as such, so she wanted to push us while we were in her class. I really appreciated that.And don’t forget that Larry Summers, who was president of Harvard at the time and now on Obama’s staff, actually said that women are inherently less-skilled at math than boys. (Which is funny because at the same time my alma mater, MIT, had a woman as its president, and we were joking about how someone at Harvard shouldn’t even be discussing math skills, but that’s another story.)I have one son, and the challenge I have is providing some kind of gender balance, since both my husband and I love the toys, books, etc. that are typically given to boys. I did buy some girlie stuff, but since I don’t enjoy these, I think my son naturally moves away from them.
I have no interest in trucks. Or watching sports. With absolutely no encouragement, my son loves both. We marvel at it – my husband doesn’t even watch sports. I feel no need to prove my son’s masculinity. It is who he is … I’ve had to learn what a payloader is though
I wonder why it’s okay to point at that women and girls have better verbal skills than boys and men, that girls tend to gain verbal and reading skills at a younger age, that women express their thoughts more clearly in speaking and writing, that young women usually have a better-developed vocabulary than young men, etc. but if you dare to point out the differences in men and women when it comes to math and science, you are sexist. I am not saying women aren’t or can’t be good at math and science, but Summers was certainly correct in pointing out that women apply to hard science programs less than men. I didn’t think he meant a difference is skill sets per se, but a difference in interest, which is something I’ve always seen among the men and women in my nerdy family. I’m great at math, and I love science as it relates to biology, and to a certain extent chemistry, but there isn’t a gender-inclusive program in the world that can make me, my sister, or any of my girl cousins give two farts about mechanical science or higher math. Please do not ask me how my gosh darn dishwasher works, I don’t care as long as the dishes get clean, and I do not ever want to hear about satelite communications again so long as I live, esp. if it involves my brother writing down the relevant equations….argh. It’s also a difference, I think, in the way the sexes learn. I believe I got as much from diagrams and text out of my anatomy classes as I did from actual cadaver work, but I could see the lightbulbs go off over some of my male classmates heads when we first got to that part of the classes. I also see that my five-year-old daughter gets a lot more from books and talk than her brothers who Must. See. It. In. Person. And. Touch. It. Please. I read a terriffic book called The Wonder Of Boys that really helped me understand the socially constructed innate differences between my daughters and sons.
er, socially constructed AND innate differences
Actually, what Summers said was that women do not have the same “innate ability” or “natural ability” in math as men do. I honestly do not think this is true. When I was in college, we had a lot of women from India, Asia, and various Middle Eastern countries. Many of these women would tell me that, growing up, they never had the sense that girls weren’t supposed to be good at technical subjects. I can’t believe that, in these countries, the “innate” abilities are more equal than in the US. To be truthful, I think in the US we discourage math and science for both sexes, which is showing in how we are falling behind technically. We can’t force kids to study these subjects, but I don’t see anything wrong with encouragement.
I think that the key here is that there is more variation within members of the same sex than there are between sexes. You have two normal curves, one of which is slightly off to the right of the other. Which means that your feeling/observations that women are “better verbally” and boys are “better in math” are basically due to you projecting your expectations on the world around you. One would just not be able to discern the actual measured difference between boys and girls in your day to day interactions.Personally, I love math. It was my favourite subject in school, and I when on to take it at university. My husband hates math. My mother is better with math than my father, although her father was more mathy than my grandmother. Although my math classes certainly had more men than women in them at uni I never noticed a difference in aptitude or learning style between the two groups. Nor did I notice a difference in high school. I should note, however, that my high school guidance counsellor told me (in 1992) that I was taking too many math classes (in which I was getting near perfect grades) and that I should drop one of them and take home economics instead. Had I dropped that math credit I wouldn’t have had the number of math credits required for taking maths at uni. So, I have no problems believing that the dearth of women in my maths classes may have been due less to lack of interest than to lack of encouragement. Oh, and my daughter loves trains with a passion. Neither my husband nor I love trains. These things happen. Not due to her sex, but because sometimes our kids have interests that differ from our own. She also loves her dollhouse. Sometimes her trains sleep in her dollhouse. Sometimes her dolls stomp around on the train table. So it goes.
The issue I have with the idea that gender is a social construct is then where do transgendered people fit into this? If this is only a small difference then why does it drive some to suicide? There is obviously something going on here we don’t understand. I think the problem is that we’re assuming this differences manifest in things like math skills rather than other less quantifiable differences. Obviously there is a difference but I wonder with articles like these if there isn’t a political bias as well.
I think that transgendered people are an obvious example of gender as a social construct. That is to say, that there is a difference between gender (socially constructed) and sex (biology). So, you can have biological men who are feminine (and vice versa). Being feminine is a socially constructed idea. A feminine person likes to dress up, is not interested in mechanical things, is not aggressive, etc. I would argue that most people have a mixture of feminine and masculine traits and that these are amplified or suppressed by society’s reaction to their biological sex. Some individuals are on the extreme end of the gender spectrum one way or the other. For those people, it may be painful if their gender does not match their biological sex, as society as a whole is disapproving of people who cross gender lines.We don’t know exactly how the brain works, and I’m sure that there are other things that come into the mix with transgendered people. However, clearly in their cases their biological sex did not determine their gender.
I have boy/girl twins and I really do notice a difference in them. They have a gender-neutral room and play with all of the same toys, which are fairly gender-neutral as well- but he really does display more “manly” traits and she is a lot daintier. My husband and I are always talking about how crazy it is that he is “such a boy” and she is “such a girl” even though they are the exact same age and raised in the same environment. He is MUCH bigger than her, rougher, wilder, etc. and she is pretty reserved and calm. Just some thoughts to share.
Anyone else find it ironic that GP advocates dressing girls in boy clothes, yet finds it unacceptable to “leave your child’s early development in the hands of a caregiver”, ie be a working mom? Let’s face it ladies, the biggest influence we have on our children on what it means to be male or female is our personal EXAMPLE. Of course, it’s harder to personally live out your ideals than to just buy different toys or clothing…