From Anti-Pacifier to Pro-Binky
How I made peace with the paci
When my first son was born, I was an idealistic and determined 22-year-old. I was going to do everything right. My little boy would not be exposed to commercialism, he would not eat junk food, and he certainly would not use a pacifier.
I abhorred pacifiers. They were funky little plastic plugs fouling up a baby’s soft, perfect little face. Gross. I didn’t want to see a baby with a pink ballerina or a flower sprouting from his mouth; I wanted to see his sweet pink lips and cheeks.
I understood that some parents liked to let their babies be comforted with a pacifier, but felt (somewhat self-righteously) that I preferred to comfort my baby myself, with nursing, rocking, or plain old attention. We showed our first three sons where their thumbs were and encouraged thumb-sucking, but none of them really took to it. They all had blankets they loved, but that was it. No thumbs AND no pacifiers. Great!
Enter son number four. After our third, we wanted another child, but we struggled with infertility and miscarriages. Finally we opted for a domestic adoption. We got Frank at birth, and I quickly learned how different caring for an adopted baby is from caring for one from your own body. For one, I fed him formula. I’d never used it much with our first three babies – only when they were babysat, which wasn’t terribly often. Sure, I followed the Newman-Goldfarb protocol for induced lactation, and I was able to breastfeed Frank (with formula supplementation) for three months, but soon it got too frustrating for both of us, and he became an exclusively bottle-fed baby. That was hard to get used to – my baby getting “milk” that wasn’t mine through an artificial nipple instead of my own. But soon I came to terms with it; that’s what’s required for some of our babies to eat and grow, and healthy little Frank had been on the high end of the growth charts since birth.
However, not breastfeeding meant that I had fewer ways to soothe him when he got fussy. With the other boys, a minute or two of light nursing calmed them on those occasions. I attempted to do the same with newborn Frank, but as the weeks went on, I got less successful and progressively sorer until I finally found myself wincing when I tried to comfort-nurse him with basically dry breasts. I desperately wanted to make him feel better, but the way I was going about it clearly wasn’t working.
That’s when it occurred to me that that the artificial nipple Frank seemed to get so much satisfaction from during bottle feedings wasn’t all that different from a pacifier. One day, looking down into the eyes of my fretful baby, I decided to give the paci a whirl.
That child loved his binky. When he was still pretty tiny, I started popping it in during car rides, and he’d contentedly suck and look at his baby toys or out the window. And it definitely came in handy when we were in public and he was insecure or crabby; it was, as its etymology suggests, an awesome little peacemaker.
It’s been interesting to see the world through my binky-accepting eyes. Now when I see babies out in public with pacifiers plugged into their mouths, I notice how confident and calm they tend to be. The sucking provides them with so much comfort and reassurance. Why wouldn’t we want that for our babies? It seems silly that it bothered me so much in the first place.
I’m also seeing the binky-haters, my former ilk, with new eyes. The first especially vocal critic I encountered was my grandmother, who was scandalized every time she saw little Frank with his pacifier. “Get that fooler out of his mouth!” she’d grumble. “He doesn’t need that thing.” It reminded me of how she’d fuss that I held our firstborn, Grant, too much. “Put that child down! He’s sleeping and he doesn’t need to be held. You’re going to spoil him.” I love my grandmother, but she was wrong about me holding Grant too much, and she’s wrong about pacifier use.
Similarly, one day when I took Frank to my gym and dropped him off at the nursery so I could work out, a gym employee actually yanked the pacifier out of his mouth, saying, “Why do you want that thing? You don’t need it!” I was furious. I told her that, since the gym was a new place for him, and he would be without me in the nursery, I wanted him to have his pacifier to comfort him. She seemed a little abashed (as she should have) and muttered something to herself about the perils of pacifier use as I restored Frank’s silicone soother to his mouth. As I headed for the treadmill, I realized with some amazement that I – I of all people – had become a bona fide defender of the bink.
Of course, I still worried a little about Frank’s attachment to his pacifier. I feared it would somehow inhibit his speech. I sometimes second-guessed why he liked it so much in the first place; was it just replacing the comfort-nursing I couldn’t provide (which still made me feel a little guilty), or did he seek it to soothe his grief over losing his birthmother (even more disheartening)? Was he too attached to it? Was he using it to satisfy needs I should be filling in other ways?
Prompted in part by my angst, my husband and I were careful to keep the pacifier from becoming the go-to remedy for every bad mood; when he was just over a year old, we transitioned Frank from frequent to special-times-only pacifier use. After just a few days of firmly telling him that Binky and his adored lovey, Puppy, now lived only in his bedroom, he got the picture. I actually think the new rule contributed to his unusually positive attitude toward bedtime; even if he’s doing something fun and would like to stay up a while longer, he’s less resistant to winding down because he knows he gets to be reunited with Binky and Puppy.
Each evening when I give him the go-ahead, Frank runs to his room and pops Binky into his mouth, grabs hold of Puppy’s ear, and settles down for a few storybooks. When I go to get him in the morning, he likes to lounge for a few minutes, holding his beloved Puppy and sucking on his Binky while we cuddle.
Then I tell him that it’s time to go downstairs and find Daddy, and he knows what that means. He tosses Puppy and Binky to the floor and runs to his bedroom door. He’s ready for the day.






Ok, here’s the thing, paci’s are ok as long as they are viewed as comfort nursing replacment, and by that I mean, they are used in a way that you would use comfort nursing. So, for settling to sleep, for a cranky baby, but not for long drawn out periods. Not for car journeys, not for the stroller and not for an actively playing baby or child. Why not? because if your non-breastfed baby is in a non-nursing situation, if they don’t need a paci.
Would you remove your breast for a fussy breastfed baby in a car seat or stroller? No, you wouldn’t, you’d pick them up, comfort them, soothe them, either with a cuddle, rocking, putting them in a slng or by nursing. The same thinking should be used for a non-breastfed baby. If they are fussy, pick them up, cuddle them, rock them, if need be, give them the paci, but you wouldn’t leave your boob in the cot with your baby whilst they went to sleep alone, so don’t do it with a paci for a non-breastfed baby.
The worst thing about paci’s, apart from the way long-term use deforms the palate and causes narrowing of the airways and dental malocclusion, is they way they are used as arms-length soothers. You can settle your baby without picking him up, without actually having to touch him. You can keep your baby quiet whilst you shop or travel for longer with him strapped into a car seat in that rigid spine-curling posture we are warned not to keep babies in for more than an hour or so.
You see? When are paci is over used, it creates distances between you and your baby. A paci should be used the same way as a breast, when your baby is in your arms, and only then. Any other way and it fosters lazy, hands-free parenting.
Pacis are just dependent on the kid. I hate them, but my son loves his. And it’s not a battle worth fighting. If he falls, he pops it in his mouth for a few minutes to calm himself down. Same if he’s sleepy or otherwise upset. I’m a breastfeeding and former co-sleeping mother (my son co-slept until 15 months) but he STILL loved his paci! It definitely did not contribute to “hands off parenting.” I held him, wore him, slept with him! But sometimes he WOULDN’T comfort nurse. He didn’t want more milk, he just wanted to suck. And so he had his paci. I sometimes wish it were not so, but that is the reality at my house. And in no way does this make me a worse or “uninvolved” parent just because of one choice I made…rather rude to say so.
I think binkys serve a purpose for the first 2 years but dont wait too long to break the habit because it can harm teeth and cause speech delays. After age two, you can break the habit with a new product called The Binky Fairy. Google it on Thumbuddy To Love web site.
Thanks so much for reading and commenting, Jehefinner and Anon. I really appreciate hearing what you have to say. I was hoping I’d get some differing viewpoints with this piece.
I hear you, Jehefinner, in general, but don’t agree that any pacifier use outside of a parent’s arms is “lazy parenting.” I do think that the paci can be abused, but I don’t think we are guilty of it. It may be a crutch, but I don’t feel that this sort of crutch is necessarily something to avoid.
For example, Frank is about to start a two day a week preschool. I’ve told the owner that he should only have Binky and Puppy at naptime – BUT, if he’s really distressed on the first day when I leave him, she can let him have it then. Sure, he’d quit crying eventually without Binky, and she has assured me that she will do all she can to comfort and distract him as he adjusts to being away from me. It’s nice to know, though, that his soother from home will be on hand in this brand new environment. After the first couple of days I will ask her to be firm about the naptime-only stance, because I don’t want him walking around and interacting with people regularly with a paci in his mouth.
And FWIW, I do slip it out of his mouth when I go in to check on him at night, so it’s not in his mouth all night long.
The medical issues involved with “pacifier abuse” are not trivial, and I would never let Frank have his paci again if we were headed down a dire health road. I trust his doctor completely. We just saw him for Frank’s two year checkup, and I described Frank’s pattern of pacifier use to him. His doctor has no concerns with his oral development, speech, or airways, and Frank’s never had a single ear infection. I’d toss all those binkies immediately if his doctor told me to.
I agree, Anon, that kids are wildly different, and some kids are more orally soothed than others. Letting him have a paci if he loves it is hardly uninvolved. I think it’s lovingly responsive.
This is Frank’s daddy…
I can’t stand pacifiers. My primary beef is I think they look really tacky. As Julie indicated, our first three children didn’t use them and I’m glad.
That being said, Frank takes such great comfort in his at bedtime, that I can’t see anything other than sweetness when he asks for it and settles down.
Would I prefer to have a paci-free toddler? Yep. But I think it’s my own trying-to-be-a hip-parent vanity that makes me feel that way.
And, when it comes down to it…I’ve never seen a grown kid with a pacifier habit.
The Binky Fairy looks adorable, mamaski! I love it. I’ve talked with one friend who ended up collecting all her son’s paci’s in a ziplock and letting him “cash them in” for a puppy (she had obviously spoken to the mama dog’s owner first) which I think is so funny. We don’t have any need for another pet any time soon, but the “cashing them in” idea is pretty cute, I think. Another ended up cutting the business ends off of her daughter’s binkies so that she didn’t have to have the no-more-pacifiers discussion at all, but I think that’s probably a bit more extreme that I want to be. And another had her child pack them up to mail them to the little babies who needed them most, which is very sweet idea, and sounds like it’s along the lines of the Binky Fairy. The Binky Fairy might be just the ticket when it’s time for Frank to give it up. Thanks for the tip, and thanks for reading and commenting.
My little boy used the paci for about 2 years. I am an attachment parent, I breastfed for the first year, did baby wearing, and co-slept. However, my son really needed the paci. At first, he used it for soothing anytime. If he did not have a paci in the car, he screamed the whole time we drove (this lasted until his car seat was turned around at 1). I think it really depends on the child and what they need. Had my son had the choice, he would have nursed constantly, which was not possible, he needed the sucking to soothe himself. When he began speaking around 10 months, the paci became a part time thing. We finally eliminated the paci around 2 with the paci fairy and he never looked back. His teeth are fine, his speech is amazing and we have seen no adverse effects from it. It was not lazy parenting that influenced us to give him the paci, but the constant screaming and a need to substitute the nipple, which he wanted constantly. To kick the habit, we broke all of his paci’s and put them under his pillow for the paci fairy, who would take them and give him a surprise. We had only one night of tears after that. He still talks about it one year later.
Congrats for being the kind of parent who knows best but also listens to her child; you’re obviously both better for it
As a mother of two children, the first of whom refused a pacifier in favor of using my boob as a constant source of comfort , and a three month old baby who is already a ‘pacifier kid’, I must say I am pro-binky all the way. In fact, I’m in love. I in no way miss those sleepless nights spent hunched over and comfort nursing. In fact, in retrospect I think being a 24/7 diner made me feel resentful at the time and I’m thankful that my baby has a means to self-soothe. I’ll gladly deal with the process of giving it up in two years for a night of good sleep and being able to set my baby down by herself for naps so I can give my preschooler some much-needed Mom time. Also, maybe I am odd but I think there is something really cute about a sleeping baby with a pacifier.
I just cannot stand them, and luckily both my daughters think the back of them is yummier than the ‘nipple’. I just think too many parents use them for the wrong reasons…yours sounds like you did it right, not unendingly…
Neither of my kids took a pacifier. I was grateful that I wasn’t constantly searching for one in the car or in the middle of the night. However, I got super tired of BEING the paci!
If my kids had liked pacis, I wouldn’t have cared one bit.
Great perspective!I can so relate. I was “anti-paci” with my first two kids until baby 3 came along. I can’t remember exactly why I gave it to her initially – but she loved it, and immediately took to it. She kept it during nap time and bed time until she was about 2, when she handed it to me and said, “I don’t need this”. No joke. That was that. Enter baby number four…he sucks his thumb on and off. This worries more than the paci ever did. Anyways, good post, ty for sharing!
I was always anti-paci. I babysat alot growing up and most of the babies I knew were so paci-dependent that it made me say no way would I give my babies one…flash forward to my first, born 11 weeks early. In the NICU the use pacifiers to strengthen and teach babies to suck. I was reluctant at first but would do anything to help my tiny guy. My son loved his paci. By age 4 months he had decided he didn’t want it anymore..my second baby was born 7 weeks early and this time I knew he would be getting a paci. My second never really took to it so by the time he was 3 months old he was done. Our neonatologist also said that new studies show that using a paci lowers the risk of SIDS. My aversion to it has always been when a baby is perfectly happy and the parent is trying to get them to take it.
Thanks so much, Anon, Mrs4444, Jackie, KCW, Melissa, and colerecer for reading and commenting. I’m really enjoying everyone’s perspectives, and I’m totally intrigued by the paci fairy now. I’m with you, Allison, and I think there’s something empowering about little ones using pacifiers to calm themselves down. Maybe it does help with independence, you think? I do remember, KCW, those days of being the paci for my other sons. That got really old at times for me as well. That’s so cute, Melissa, that your daughter decided she didn’t need it on her own. I would be so floored if Frank did that any time soon. Interesting perspective, colerecer. I think I remember hearing something about SIDS and pacifier use, as well. I’m glad you had a positive and helpful experience with your little ones’ paci use.
Great outlook Julie! I’m a new young mom and am finding ways that best work with our daughter and I. She is now 6 months old. I allowed her the paci up until she was about 4 months old and slowly weaned her off of it as her “bedtime paci” and at about 5 months saw she didnt really need her paci at all. I’ve read that pacifers help reduce the risk of SIDS up until the age of 3 months. Each and every baby is completely different than the others. I’ve come to firmly believe that moms know best for her and her family: paci lover or not.
I am a 61 year old mother of 2 and grandmother to 8. I don’t normally read this blog sight, but my daughter mentioned that there were some interesting articles I might enjoy (also interested in autism diagnosis and treatments)..Anyway, I was intrigued by this article and wanted to comment. My parenting history began in the late 60′s with woman’s lib and social rebellion. As a young mother, I did not breastfeed my children..the current fad was to use canned similac that was supposed to provide rounded nutrition and vitamins for baby. It was convenient at that time for working mothers not to breastfeed but to use the “formula”. I was encouraged to start cereal by 2 months and fruits/vegetables as soon as they could tolerate them. My children did not have ‘foolers’, per se. I did not feel comfortable with them (nor did my mother!!). I was always afraid they would break or chew off a piece of it and then choke on it. However, neither of my children suffered. My son had his blanket, “pee-pi”, to rub the satin trim which comforted him when going to sleep. My daughter had her “manket” and her thumb to comfort her when needed. She was always funny with it–to touch the blanket meant the thumb automatically went in the mouth. Both outgrew this needed comfort by age 2 and a half or three (can’t honestly remember)..Anyway, it strikes me as curious as to how the trends have changed and yet the children are doing fine anyway…hmmm…so I say: WHATEVER!!..My kids were not warped (in my perspective anyway) with the formula, blanket addictions and food before six months. Both are grown independent thinkers, in good health and with advanced college degrees. OK, personally, I do not care for the “fooler or Binky” in a child’s mouth. It hides their handsome faces. I do think that new advancements in ‘fooler technology” have made them more childproof and parents don’t have to worry so much about their baby swallowing a piece of the appliance. So that being said, I agree with Julie A. if the baby is upset and crying — you can’t do a thing with him–driving you crazy!!–for goodness sake comfort him with a “Binky”. It won’t hurt him, trust me. As they grow into toddlers they will naturally outgrow the need for these baby comforts. Bottom line, love your child and feel no guilt–he will prosper…
I’m pretty neutral on use of the pacifier, but it does really bother me when mothers judge each other about such things. Every baby is different, and not to quote a Jerry Springer guest, but, “You don’t know me!” Most stuff is none of our business, anyway, so why bother being all judgmental about it? Just do the best you can, and if I see your babe with a paci out in public I promise I won’t bat an eyelash.
OUr first was a paci kid until we weaned him from it at 6 mos. He would lose it at night every 10 minutes and scream until we came in and got it for him. It drove us crazy. After that, we probably(?) used it in public, but never at nap or night. My second two are both thumb suckers, and I have to say that I wish *they* were paci kids too! You can take the paci away, or restrict it to bedroom use only, but you can’t take the thumb away! My 3 1/2 sucks his thumb at night and nap and when he’s tired; I’m never sure if or how to wean him from that (orthodontic fears). Soooooo much easier with that first child to just be the “mean mama” and take it away. =) Enjoyed this piece.
Great article and I hope first time Mothers soak it up. We have all been there, all thought that raising a baby is balck and white, so pleas relax and go with it. Really it is none of peoples business if your child has a soother. I would simply tell them “it doesn’t bother me or my child so why is it bothering you?”! I was telling my friend on the phone the other night how I am trying to get my 4 yr old off of her soother. My daughter and I have made a deal that she will stop at 5 yrs, and in the mean time it is a night time thing. Well my girlfriend laughed and told me not to worry about it as she went in to see her 13 yr old daughter last night sleeping with her thumb in her mouth!
I love this article because it highlights that not all children have the same needs, and rigid parenting “rules” don’t apply to everyone all the time. Some babies have strong sucking needs, bottle or breastfed and the pacifier is for them. I’m always amused at strong anti-pacifier propoganda because how many adults chew pencils, use tobacco products, chew gum, drink coffee, etc to get their soothing needs met, yet would deny a child a perfectly appropriate tool such as the pacifier to calm themselves with.
My favorite articles on Babble are the ones where the author (and the reader) learns or is reminded that all babies are different, and with very few exceptions, there is no “one size fits all” rule…whether it comes to formula, binkies, thumbs, breastfeeding, discipline, babywearing, co-sleeping, etc., etc. The important thing seems to be HOW we handle it, rather than being 100% pro- or anti-. Good on you.
“When are paci is over used, it creates distances between you and your baby. A paci should be used the same way as a breast, when your baby is in your arms, and only then. Any other way and it fosters lazy, hands-free parenting.”
It’s funny – after an article about learning and the importance of not judging other parents or their parenting choice, there is always someone who comes on to judge.
My twins never took a pacifier although we tried, in an effort to help develop their sucking skills. My son, however, took one and loved his nu-nu. I nursed him for 15 months and he was always attached to me either by being held or a baby wrap. On his second birthday we took it away. He was over it. I took such crap from people about his pacifier AND my baby wearing/extended nursing. Here was my take, he wasn’t going to go off to college with the nu-nu so what was the big deal? He is now a healthy and active 4 yr old with no speech problems, dental problems and is exceedingly attached to his “lazy, hands-free” Mama. Great article, by the way!
The problem is not babies with binkys, it is 2-4 year olds! Sure I used the soothie with my kids when they were babies, but they naturally stopped around 4-6 months. I don’t know why, but there is something SO irritating about a 3 year old with a binky. There I said it! Also, I wouldn’t “encourage” thumb-sucking, not a good idea.
I think you wrote that beautifully and it was a transition similar to the one I made. Nicely done.
great great read. love it when someone else can articulate what you feel and were unable to explain.
You’re the gertesat! JMHO
We are adopting and the pacifier issue is one I’m struggling with. I don’t want it to be a crutch, something to get them quiet when rocking or cuddling would do the same. I’m torn, but know I won’t really know until we have a baby in our home and whether or not he/she will take a binky. Thanks for your thoughts. It really gives me something to think about. I didn’t know about the breast-feeding part…I’m going to look into that.
I introduced both my children to paci in the hospital. My daughter used it, my son immediately figured out it contained no milk and refused them. My daughter had colic, so when she would take the paci I was grateful. I had no trouble breaking her of it — at one point she just stopped on her own.
I, too, was anti-pacifier before having my daughter but now she is 6 mths old and she LOVES her little Giraffe Wubbanub. She sucks on the Soothie part sometimes at night but mostly loves carrying him with her everywhere and she sucks on his arms/legs/ears and loves touching him. We don’t give it to her just because she’s crying, but she does like it for night-time soothing and now that she’s teething she’s taken to biting on it. It’s not the end of the world and by the time she’s a year, we will just let her have the giraffe part probably.
I have a very anti-paci, pro-bf aunt. When I explained to her that I was using a paci, she sent me a slew of anti-paci propaganda. I started to be against it too until I realized I had overactive letdown with oversupply. Nursing would not be comfortable for my girl because of my strong and fast flow. There were some times when she obviously wanted to suck but she’d just start choking on my flow. I couldn’t get her to stop crying. I had that similar realization that I could give her the paci at other times when she was not enjoying the breastfeeding (or until I could express some of my initial flow out until it calmed down and she could eat from the breast). Now that my flow is normal and she doesn’t need comfort nursing, we don’t use the paci. But man was that a life saver.
I was anti binky forever, that was until I had my second son who was preemie by 3 weeks. And for some reason it made a difference I would have neve thought of. The day he turned 1 yrs old I took it from him, we went cold turkey. And it was a little hell for the first 3 or 4 days but ever since thn hes been fine with out it, next is the bottle. By the way my youngest is almost 14 months old.
I think a baby with a bink in his mouth is just TOO Cute. My son only has his binky for bedtime, then on SPECIAL occasions when he’s having a super hard to control mood day. We’re thinking about taking it away after his first birthday, mainly because other people’s criticism but.. I think he loves it. He does the same thing that your son does and in the morning likes to get changed while sucking his binky. He’ll take it out of his mouth and look at it and smileeeeee. It’s adorable.
My son was a 30 week preemie who need to learn how to suck and breathe at the same time since he had not gotten that stage inutero. To facilitate this the NICU staff gave him a preemie bink to suck on so he could master this skill. It was a wonder to behold.
We kept using the binks with him after we left the hospital because it was soothing for him, since I was unable to breastfeed. He held onto it longer than I wished for nights only but he gave it up easily one weekend away from home and has not looked back. He is a confident little boy who would have not thrived if it were not for the skills and comfort he got from his bink.
I love seeing people get so worked up over parenting choices that don’t really harm a child in any way. There are so many different RIGHT ways of doing things. Paci/no paci, nursing/bottle feeding, swaddle/don’t swaddle, on and on and on. Do what works for YOUR family and your child and at the end of the day, ask yourself if your child is healthy and happy and thriving. If the answer is yes then keep on keeping on because I can promise you that no child is going to head off college with a bottle or a paci or needing to be swaddled.
And when people tell you that you’re doing it wrong, ask them for their address so you can send the college bills to the right place since they clearly want a part in raising your child.