"You Don’t Get Bad Press When Youre Holding a Baby."

Spurred on by the 50th anniversary of the birth-control pill, The New York Observer devotes its entire baby-pink cover this week to “Babies, Babies, Babies!” Most pertinently, they ask how it’s happened, after the feminist post-pill wave, that these days so many hipsters and Hollywood celebrities are all about procreating. The juiciest Hollywood analysis comes from Fear of Flying author Erica Jong:

“There is a whole pop-culture trend towards maternity. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt having six, seven, whatever. Jennifer Lopez having twins, Nadya Suleman having a whole bunch and then eight more. Babies, babies, babies. You can always make the cover of a magazine if you have a baby. Even I, who got these hideous attacks for leading women down the garden path to embrace their sexuality, when I had a baby in my arms, my press changed. First I was the happy hooker of literature—then I turned into Mother Theresa. You don’t get bad press when you’re holding a baby.”

What are your thoughts on this? She’s not saying that celebs are having kids simply to get good press, but rather that mommyhood has become a near-guarantee of good, and extremely extensive, coverage. Think about it: The celeb magazines (People, Us, Ok!) bid millions of dollars for every new photo of an A-Listers and her newborn. There’s virtually no other photo that editors pay that much for.

ART: Drew Friedman for the NY Observer

Tagged as: , ,

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, profile photo and other personal information you make public on Facebook (e.g., school, work, current city, age) will appear with your comment. Learn More.