Strollerderby

Nebraska Dad Who Dumped 9 Kids Speaks Out

Posted by thenewsjunkie on September 26th, 2008 at 1:47 pm

So that guy who took advantage of Nebraska’s safe haven law and dumped his nine kids, ages 1 to 17, off at a hospital? He’s speaking out. He said his life fell apart last year when his wife died — after giving birth to their youngest child.

The widower also said he still loves his children, but that he couldn’t care for them properly. “I hope they know I love them,” Gary Staton told KETV. “I hope their future is better without me around them.”

Here’s why he says he took advantage of Nebraska’s law, which allows parents to abandon, without questions or penalty, a child up to 19 years old who is in their custody:

After his wife died, he quit his job to take care of the five boys and four girls. So he couldn’t pay his rent, utilities, or feed the family. He said he didn’t think he could raise the kids without his wife and that he wanted them to be safe.

Stanton has a 10th child, an 18-year-old daughter who graduated from high school early. She was not a part of the drop off. 

I’m overwhelmed just thinking about this family’s situation. Here are some questions: what about Nebraska laws kept him from getting help with his rent? With that many kids, you’d think he’d qualify for any and every program out there. Plus, mental health? Did anybody check up on this guy? 

Finally, I’m sitting here feeling super sorry for him and the entire family but of course, buzzing in the back of my mind was, why such a big family? But putting that aside, I wonder too: had it been the other way around — dad died and mom chose to abondon the kids, I wonder what the sentiment would be? 

Oh, and now that so many older kids are being abandoned in Nebraska, lawmakers are thinking of amending the law. What? That’ll make these families’ problems go away?

What do you think of this situation?

 

Photo: creightonhospital.com

Go Back To Strollerderby

11 Comments

Having 9 children is socially irresponsible in this day and age of limited natural resources. Poverty is not an excuse for not using birth contol. Not only are condoms cheap and readily available, but Planned Parenthood provides subsidized birth control pills on a sliding scale based on abilty to pay. It is unfortunate the PP is demonized by the social conservatives who have such tunnel vision that they miss the fact that PP provides a WIDE Range of services, such as family planning, STD treatment, etc. It is all about empowering woman. Clearly this poor woman who died while birthing her 9th child was not empowered and didn’t have access to resources to control her own fertility.

Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

Steffmarcusky said it well. Perhaps he wasn’t giving them up, he was giving them more, as the pro-birth, anti choice ad’s say. So all you anti abortion folks, who say that babies shouldn’t be aborted because there are all these wonderful homes to adopt them, step up to the plate and offer to adopt the teenagers in foster homes who were TAKEN AWAY from their parents. I had great parents, but I KNOW I wouldn’t want to live with someone who didn’t want me, couldn’t care for me, or didn’t want me to live with them.

Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

I’m guessing that he didn’t have the ability/programming to accept help until he was too depressed to be able to deal with it. I really think there’s a mental health issue that he didn’t take care of for himself, and potentially even for his children. And from there, he didn’t realize that he could take advantage of other governmental programs, and just fell apart.

steffmarcusky commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

How do you know he was the one refusing to use birth control? Family decisions are just that – decisions made by mothers and fathers. And whether the decision to have a large family was made because of religious reasons or just because they wanted a large family – or for any other reason – I don’t feel like I could call them “ignorant” or “selfish.” How does that help? Maybe the large family thing was working out just fine until the mother died. How much would childcare cost for a family of that size if a parent were to work full time?

Not that this justifies his decision. I don’t know all of the facts, and I doubt I will. But I do know that this is probably not a decision he could have undertaken lightly.

mags commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

K, The oldest daughter did pitch in extensively. In fact, I’m guessing that it’s she who did most of the parenting (she was an honor roll student and very responsible) as this parent seemed to be psychologically unstable, especially if he was unable to go through social services or churches or relatives (who have since taken in the children) to help. Both vasectomies and condoms are cheap, relatively speaking. I don’t have too much sympathy for this guy. There is no reason to have that many children except out of ignorance and selfishness or refusal to use birth control.

Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

I don’t understand why he thought quitting his job was going to help him take care of the kids.

Were the older kids too much brats to help with their siblings? The 18 year old was so estranged she couldn’t stick around to help out?

I always thought those large families had lots stronger inter-reliance.

Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

Well, this is the first I’ve heard of the story, so I’ll have to go Google it. Just from what I’ve read, though, it seems like a tragic situation all around. Does the guy not have any family to speak of? No parents of his own, in-laws, siblings, cousins that could have helped? Where I come from family is a big deal and I know that if anything were to happen to me, my family would help out in any way they could to make sure my daughter and my man were taken care of. Did he look into other options before he decided to take advantage of this law? I disagree with other comments that there is little help for the poor. That is a cop-out. It’s so easy to blame others for one’s own misfortunes, but regardless of fault (whether or not there is any), each person has responsibilities. How we take care of those responsibilities makes us who we are. I do not believe this man did everything he could to take care of his family before giving them up. I just did a Google search on help for the poor in Nebraska and there seems to be quite a bit of help out there.

Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

This is the problem with Safe-Haven laws. Without them, people go through proper channels to place children for adoption. The children have real records of the process. In a situation like this, a parent would have to contact social services and receive some help. Even if the kids went into state care, they wouldn’t have this “abandoned” label or experience of being dumped out of a car somewhere.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

Was there some reason the older kids couldn’t or didn’t pitch in?

Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

Probably so many kids because like many poor people they could not afford birth control. At 40-75 dollars a month for BC pills that is steep. Is sex only for the middle class and wealthy now? There are few if any free clinics anymore because the religious right has run them all out of town because they want poor people to have more babies. This guy did his best. There are few social services for the poor anymore. This guy is not selfish bu turning them over to DFACS, he is the most unselfish hoping his kids can eat properly, have heat, a home, clothes, go to the doctor when they are sick. When you are poor and homeless you dont have these things. Love and comfort odes not fill your tummy, keep you warm in Nebraska with winter coming or make you well when you are sick. Those kids know he loves them. He gave up everything to take care of them, even gave them up.

Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

Those poor kids. Why didn’t this guy seek some real help? I find men often give themselves the “get out of jail free” card when it comes their kids – I’m thinking of my own husband when faced with a crying newborn – just deal with it!

And what’s up with the selfishness: “I hope they know I love them,” ??? I doubt that very much now that they live in various foster homes, separated from all that comforted them especially after the death of their mother.

Ugh, I feel sick just thinking about it.

Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads