Strollerderby
What’s Wrong with "Women and Children First?"
The crash of Flight 1549 came just when the nation needed it – a crisis averted, a hero in our midst, nearly two hundred people saved. Next to the inaguration, it’s the brightest spot what’s been an otherwise bleak American horizon of late.
But we’re a country that thrives on some sort of scandal – so it’s no surprise the heroism of Chesley B. “Sully” Sullenberger has quickly turned to criticism of the age-old (at least one hundred and fifty-some year-old) standard of evacuating people in case of tragedy: “women and children first.”
To be fair, I’m biased. I am, after all, a woman. I’m also a mother. So women and children rank pretty high on my list. By all accounts, I should be rushing to the defense of the mandate Jezebel aptly dubbed “strangely quaint” and “old fashioned.”
A lot of what Jezebel’s Sadie said made sense – there has to be some organizational basis for getting people moved from here to there, and few would argue with a child’s right to be cut the line in light of a tragedy. Children first, at least, is almost irrefutable. They still have a chance at a life. They still have time left to make a difference.
But Sadie makes one very salient point – kids need caregivers when they’re rescued. And last I checked, caregivers come in all forms – daddies too. So what happens when we stick to “women and children first?” If a child is traveling with their Dad in tow, is the screaming tot ripped from his arms and thrust into those of a stranger, wriggling and crying? Add a toddler torquing his body in frustration to an already stressful situation, and you’ve just lost precious moments.The organizaton you’re striving for can be dealt that fatal blow with the moments lost calming them down.
Yes, I would want to get off a sinking plane as quickly as possible – and with my daughter in my arms. But as important as I would hope someone thinks I am in my daughter’s life, so too is my husband, my father, my brother . . . I am not a he-man hating feminist (yes, some of them still exist). If one of them were there with my child, I would hope that an able-bodied adult would be willing to let child and “male relative caregiver” take the place of “mother/woman.”
Perhaps the more appropriate choice is children – with appropriate caregiver – first, to be followed by whomever the pilot and his crew thinks can be gotten to next in the most organized fashion?
Image: AP
Related Posts:
Having a Kid Alone? Don’t Tell Me Why I Have it Better
Fire Starts While Toddler has Mom Locked in the Basement
Zimbabwe Releases Jailed Toddler
Mom Says Hospital Fouled Childbirth – Twice
Survey Time: How Will Becoming a Mother Change You?
Go Back To Strollerderby
3 Comments
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amMy husband is stronger than I am, and a better swimmer. We are the same height, but he’s heavier. He’d have a better chance of surviving in the water than I would. He is a sensitive new-age guy (he even added MY name when we married) but would insist on me and our daughter going first, and would do the same for others.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI think is is a loosely interpreted custom. This is a silly piece. Everyone knows a screaming tot will never be ripped from the arms of their father to adhere to a custom in an emergency. I have never heard of it and I doubt anyone else has. Jezebel, ah yes, the bastion of mediocrity, the girly gossip sheet of the news world.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amAbsolutely! I think “women and children first” is just so ingrained in our vocabulary that it’s what came to their lips first. As a woman without children, I don’t assume that my gender gives me more right to survive than anyone else. I believe that those who are able should help others as best they can.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes


The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.