Strollerderby
Would You Respect A "Stay-At-Home Wife"?
After my husband and I married 11 years ago, I was home for about a year and a half before our first child was born. I taught a couple of college classes, but that didn’t keep me very busy, so I had plenty of time to go to the gym, and do whatever else I did during those idyllic pre-kid days.
But we were trying to get pregnant from the beginning. I’m not sure how my husband would have felt if I wanted to stay home and NOT have kids.
Apparently, such stay-at-home wives represent a growing group. Many highly educated women are choosing, when their financial situation allows it, to stay home for different reasons: to pursue advanced degrees, to explore creative outlets, to do charity work, to manage health issues, or just to focus on traditional homemaking activities, such as baking, sewing, gardening, etc.
Do these women, by depending on their husbands’ incomes without taking on the (allegedly) higher purpose of caring for children, reject everything feminism has worked so hard to achieve? Maybe. Daniel Buccino, a social worker and psychotherapist at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, calls such women the ultimate “status symbols,” since their lifestyle alerts the rest of the world that the husband makes enough money for the both of them. And the men involved in these arrangements are often happy because, instead of sharing chores equally, their stay-at-home wives manage the domestic front themselves.
Look, I would never judge another woman’s choices. But I have to say, it would probably give me pause if one of my daughters came to me in twenty years and told me that all she wanted was to spend her days cooking, cleaning and basically taking care of her husband.
Go Back To Strollerderby
65 Comments
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amLet’s see if I can get this topic back from the “stay at home mom” to the “stay at home wife”
![]()
I am a university student about to receive my BA of nursing degree in approximately a year. After graduating I plan to be a stay at home wife for a while until I have children. I grew up in a very … how do I say “don’t ever let a man run your life” sort of household. However, my life goal is to stay home, continue with my red cross charity work and take care of the house/husband. Shortly after moving in with my husband I realized what made me happy. I felt satisfied when I cooked meals, cleaned the house and made sure the grass was watered. I am a much happier person because I have found my own “click” in society.
I think that it is extremely ‘snarky’ to say that stay at home wives do not add to society. If me choosing to stay at home makes me happy and my husband happy then at least that it two people that are happier!
Everyone has their ‘calling’ and it is not for me or anyone to judge what makes them happy. If you are a hard working engineer and it makes you happy, then that is wonderful! As long as what you do makes you happy
There is already too much negativity in this world for us to be judging others on a stupid web blog ;D
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI think women should get a job and contribute. Kids will be better off these days in a tough to live in world not being babies at home by Mommy anyways…PLUS…. The Stay-at-home mom EXCUSE is one of the many reasons why there is an obesity problem in America. Depressed stay-at-home mom or woman, sits on her ass all day and eats and watches TV, claiming that parenting is a full time job, while her little fat brats are writing on the walls, stuffing their faces, screaming at the top of their lungs and fighting amongst themselves, while lazy fat mom is paying no mind. Stay at home moms should get a job and quit using their kids as their excuse to be lazy (especially when the chances of their kids growing up to be losers is LARGE anyways).
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI am a full time SAHW, mother of 2 semi-launched young adults, soapmaker, & wife for 30 years. I am proud to say that I am a homemaker….I feel no shame…but I am totally frustrated at the societal attitude towards homemakers.
If others have a problem with our choice to be a homemaker it is just “their problem” This is my choice, it works for me and my family. I find it hard to swallow when others somehow find the need to judge my decision to live my own life like I see fit. Why is it that I have to explain myself for my choices. Today, it seems that I am like the “working woman” of the fifties that was looked down upon with suspect for her choice to work outside the home…wrong then and wrong now…women who choose to work within the home today should NOT be looked down upon ….People should just let human beings be who they are and make the choices that are right for them personally.
I work my butt off, in the home…we have more money with me at home than we would make if I worked full time..I am a penny pincher…..and run a strict family budget. I have a small soapmaking venture that pays for the family vacation every year… I make all homemade cleaning supplies, I cook, clean, sew, and NO bon bon’s are not part of my food plan…and I feel that if one more person asks me what I do all day…I will just scream….I don’t make judgements of those who are in the workplace …I champion women’s rights, issues, and feminist values….I am a homemaker that is a true feminist…I honor a woman’s right to choose the path for her life…and this is my path….all that most homemakers ask for is the same respect and dignity to be given to them ….as is given to the woman who chooses work outside the home…Women it is time we support our cause of “the right to choose our path” instead of slamming each other for the choices we make….
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI am a full time SAHW, mother of 2 semi-launched young adults, soapmaker, & wife for 30 years. I am proud to say that I am a homemaker….I feel no shame…but I am totally frustrated at the societal attitude towards homemakers.
If others have a problem with our choice to be a homemaker it is just “their problem” This is my choice, it works for me and my family. I find it hard to swallow when others somehow find the need to judge my decision to live my own life like I see fit. Why is it that I have to explain myself for my choices. Today, it seems that I am like the “working woman” of the fifties that was looked down upon with suspect for her choice to work outside the home…wrong then and wrong now…women who choose to work within the home today should NOT be looked down upon ….People should just let human beings be who they are and make the choices that are right for them personally.
I work my butt off, in the home…we have more money with me at home than we would make if I worked full time..I am a penny pincher…..and run a strict family budget. I have a small soapmaking venture that pays for the family vacation every year… I make all homemade cleaning supplies, I cook, clean, sew, and NO bon bon’s are not part of my food plan…and I feel that if one more person asks me what I do all day…I will just scream….I don’t make judgements of those who are in the workplace …I champion women’s rights, issues, and feminist values….I am a homemaker that is a true feminist…I honor a woman’s right to choose the path for her life…and this is my path….all that most homemakers ask for is the same respect and dignity to be given to them ….as is given to the woman who chooses work outside the home…Women it is time we support our cause of “the right to choose our path” instead of slamming each other for the choices we make….
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amThis is another societal “status symbol” for the rising white bourgeois. This doesn’t happen hardly (if at all) in other cultures residing in this country let alone the state of Texas. I’m not sure how things are in other cities across the U.S., but I live in Dallas and this sort of thing is common-place. For example, the suburbs of Plano and Frisco are crawling with these trophy wives who ride around in Range Rovers, Escalades, and Mercedes with shiny wheels, big sunglasses, and the latest fashion from some $uper expen$ive boutique store all on the husband’s dime. This is directed at the households that have zero kids – just two people. I can definitely understand this situation if there are newborns and very young children involved. But this is not the case from my observations. If this sort of arrangement works for their household/marriage, then so be it. Personally, I think it’s disgusting that these women do nothing all day but supposedly “clean and run errands”. Please. Its mass consumerism and self beautification. For two people in a generous home for the neighborhoods I described above would amount to about 2 hours worth of work 2 or 3 times a week – Hardly a real job if you asked me.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amThere are couple countries where people can survive with one persons earning. I am from one of them. My wife is doing her 3 years hons course and she helps me in cooking home food, helps me in getting late for office, 100% taking care our only child (which is the most important part of our both’s life, handles all the family engagement etc etc. So basically we both are handling two different issues of our daily life with good understanding. I ways say my wife, basically what I earn, half is yours and you can spend whereever you want even my portion as well. I belive women stay at home can concentrate more feminine issues greatly than man can do.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amWait a second, feminisim is NOT about equality. If it was,we could all try out for any old team in professional sports. Feminism is about EQUITY, which is a whole different ballgame. It means that not everyone can pitch so why should we all try? Some of us are damn good in the outfield and you still need those folks on the team, so recognize their contributions, value what they bring to the table. One size does not fit all. Equity means we have a wide range of sizes and we all have the same opportunity to pick what fits us best. Thisis real feminism, and when it is embraced by women who value the concept of equity, we will have no use for this stupid debate.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amWow , it amazes me that no one thinks staying home and raising children, is a worthwhile job. Values in this country seem to revolve around money. That is sad.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amBefore my husband and I had our daughter, I was doing my Masters part-time and teaching aerobics classes. To be completely honest, I felt really bored sometimes. It’s like I had to have something to do so I would either go work out like crazy or make elaborate meals.
I don’t know how truly bored I would have been had I not been working on my Masters degree and teaching aerobics. I would have searched out intently for a full-time job to give me something to do.
I’ve been a mom for nearly 18 months and sometimes I itch for at least a good part-time job because I enjoy working. I guess that if these women are doing something like volunteer work or helping out in the community, I can understand their fulfillment. If they aren’t doing anything, aside from shopping and cleaning the house, they must be really bored. Or maybe they work out all day at the gym. Anyways, whatever they do in their business and between their husbands and them. However I couldn’t see myself in that position.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amStop being douche bags. Staying at home and caring for your family and husband is a privilege. Just because you got your degree and you’re not usuing it does not mean you are a complete waste to society. If you have no respect for women who stay at home, then you don’t respect yourself. Most women would love to stay at home while their husbands work. Like I said, it’s a privilege and a luxury. If you don’t have to work, why should you? That doesn’t mean you have to sit around on your fat ass and eat bon bons all day. You are more than welcome to volunteer at the local homeless shelters, teach a couple classes at church during wednesday nights and still come home and prepare dinner. I call that a superwoman.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI believe that it is the choice of both the man and woman. As long as it is agreeable between both to work or stay home the option is there. I myself work a full time job and make ends meet. My wife is on and off again with work. I understand that not every job is right for someone and the person should be giving the chance to find his or her true calling as long as it fesiable. I am very libreal. I was brought up in a home of two sisters and a mother. My father was not around. My first mirrage ended and I got the kids. So far my second mirrage has been going. But communication between the two of us is key.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amDang…I did that. Off and on for the first 7 years of our marriage. I also battled depression and a blood sugar condition. I feel no apologies for holding two college degrees and not always holding a job–both of my fields require master’s degrees to do anything of interest, and I failed to get into grad school when it seemed most feasible and then postponed it to work while my husband went to grad school. And then I’d had so many jobs I loathed that I burned out on the work world and took a pause. Our choice as a couple–not some researcher’s who doesn’t realize that having a toxic job can be even more invalidating than having no job.
Amazing how judgmental some of those comments are, though. I’m going to wander off to lick my psychic wounds, now!
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amSarahJ, yep, that’s what the patriarchy has always wanted women to think. Glad to see you spout their ranks.
Amy Lutz, I think the real question should be ‘Should women who work or stay at home care about your damn opinion?’ The answer should obviously be NO!
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI think this became a SAHM vs. working mother in the original article with the word “allegedly”. Just who in the hell do you people think you are? Yes, there is a handful of women in the world who fit in the ladies who lunch category, but aren’t most of us doing what works for our own situations? So many posters have said that its okay to stay at home if there are:children, charity, art, education, whatever. Who are you to decide what makes another persons life choices worthy? I stayed home with my kid for his first 3 years, now I’m back in school. If you don’t like it, go to hell. If you do like it, it still doesn’t make a piss-pots worth of difference to me. If you couldn’t care less, congratulations, I declare you a rational human being, because why should you give a rats patoot about some random internet stranger’s life?
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amAt what point did this become about stay-at-home moms and not stay-at-home-wives? It is very easy to take a piece of writing and dissect to a person’s convenience. For those of you who state that people with talents are not paid well, what type talents are you referring to? Singing, acting, painting, sculpting…? This is very offensive. My husband, an engineer, is awesome in math, can figure out computer languages in a jiffy, and create computer programs. This allows him to earn a very decent living for both of us. He plays basketball exceptionally well but unfortunately was injured and could not pursue this passion. He also plays guitar very well and for a brief period of his life earned a living by performing in public places such as framer’s markets, malls, etc. The pay was decent but not great. So, you tell me, which of these is a talent?
I play several insturments, like cooking and do it well, and am a decent singer. I am also a research scientist going for my PhD and am good at what I do. Which of these do you conisder a talent?
SAHM and SAHW seem to be fidgeting in there seats too much, and find it necessary to defend their positions. I just want to reach out and brush the chip off your shoulder. You don’t need to defend them, SAHM, let your work speak for itself. SAHW, I do believe that one way of showing solidarity with you husbands is to work or study: be it charitable work, wage-earning work, classes that keep up your skills and/or education. I know there are exceptions such a taking care of an ill relative. If one day he decides to take a sabbatical, becomes ill, or is injured he will not be stressed knowing that you can take over. If, God forbid, he passes away or you divorce, then you can jump in and care for yourselves. Even if you are a Trump you need to keep yourselves busy and up-to-date. If you are a Trump then you better move your butts because there are a lot of people who need you.
Marie Eve commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amOuch, Lori’s words hurt. I never thought I’d comment so many times on a same post, but I can’t help thinking you didn’t really read my previous comments completely and correctly? I’m also thinking that this is not entirely targeted towards me, but probably rather just the expression of your build-up of personal frustration at a general sentiment of negativity towards women who do not have a career.
I do not believe I’m shallow and short-sighted, and all the while I have never said that women only deserve respect if they work: I was only talking about my own experience here. I didn’t believe I expressed a mere judgment but rather a realization (when I wrote that “my own self-respect comes with a paycheck”) which for me, comes after going through a very difficult situation and unhealthy dynamic between two people, followed by a very painful, personal break-up and resulting catastrophic divorce, so if you don’t want people to judge you (which I absolutely don’t), please don’t judge me.
What you do with your own life is none of my business and I still think it can be valuable to be a stay-at-home mom, but it’s very important not to fall into the trap of generalization here. Good for you if your choices worked out, but I believe happy families have little to do with whether the woman works outside the house or not. Working women certainly cannot be viewed as the cause of the rampant divorce rate, and they most definitely cannot be automatically associated with disorganized households, unhappy children and stressed out lives. Nothing is ever that easy.
I completely agree when you say that employment has nothing to do with your worth in life, but I must say that despite your well-meaning last paragraph, I still find your comment very judgmental towards working women like me, who simply try to make the best of it every day.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI had the best of both worlds. I have been married going on 29 yrs now and raised 3 girls in that time. I decided when my young started Kinergarden I would go back to school. At the time my husband was working afternoon. So it worked out great for me. Thur all that we even tryied to open a couple of businesses and even sent the kids to private shcool. I now astay at home wife due to health reason. And I do not regret the road I took to get here. Be glad you have a choice to choose you path. I watched how my parents did it and took it from there.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amWhy would anyone think that a stay at home wife was not able to get validation. I have been a stay at home first raiding kids and now doing tons of charity work and anyhting else I choose.
It is very rewarding and fills my time more than a full time job !
I respect women who choose to work for pay but I feel blessed that I can work for the good feeling and knowing that I am making a difference in the world.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am“Reject everything feminism has worked so hard to achieve” ? To me this is a choice every woman should have … isn’t feminism about making your own choices? If a woman chooses to stay at home and take care of the household and her husband more power to her … this country was founded on family and should get back to those values … maybe if the families in this country tried to model what the families were 60 years ago than 1/2 of them wouldn’t end up in divorce … what’s this country coming to? And who says a college education is the best choice anyway? Is a Ph.D gonna save your marriage when it’s falling apart?? NO … time and effort is which is what stay at home wives are putting into it!
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amSo I am still a medical student and plan on specializing in surgery…but lets say somewhere down the line I want to stay at home with my kids…does that mean that my education was a waste? Does that mean that I should never have gone to college and I didn’t deserve to get into medical school? I am completely offended by the comments which state that girls who want to stay at home with their kids should not go to college and keep the admissions open for other kids (boston mama). Education is not for the sole purpose of earning money. I truly hope that the women who think like that do not pass on such ridiculous views to their children.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am“Being a stay-at-home mother is a risky but benevolent choice that clearly can benefit your children. Just being a stay-at-home wife and taking care of your home, though, is parasitic.”
Benevolent towards whom?
You are benefiting your child by staying home. Right? And you obviously have a selfish investment in how your child turns out. Because it’s your child. You likely didn’t make that choice for the good of society. (Although I’ll give you that if our kids are happy and educated, etc…it’s good for society.)
So it’s still really kind of selfish when you think about it. (The desire for children is inherently selfish.) What about all the moms who can’t afford to stay home with their children? Aren’t you actually hurting their chances of success and happiness by giving your child the luxury of your time when others can’t?
Just seems like a weird division there. It’s not like being a SAHM is comparable to being Mother Teresa.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amAlso, ladies, regarding feminism: if you’d like to be accorded equal opportunities as men, you must also be willing to take up equal responsibilities as well. This includes providing for the financial support of your household. All the house cleaning in the world isn’t going to pay the mortgage.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amOK, “SAHW”s….at LEAST please stop pretending that you’re doing work equivalent to an actual job. “So you are saying if you pay a housekeeper to clean your house and do your laundry then you consider it work. But if one person in a marriage or partnership wants to stay home and do the same then it’s not? ” *Absolutely it’s not*!! Housecleaners clean 3 or 4 entire houses a day, every day. You are cleaning one once a week. Doesn’t count. Plus, those of us that work are doing our jobs plus that “job”. And there’s no question which one’s harder and requires a brain of some sort. Bunny, you got it right!!! Lazy!
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amIf you decide not to contribute financially in any way to the marriage, you lose 100% of the decision making power. If you choose to be totally dependent, you’re a household employee paid by your husband. You get no say in what he does with his money, and you’re not an equal partner in any sense of the word. Shut up, put out, and clean the house. Pretty embarrassing and shameful existence if you ask me.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amJust because a woman is employed outside the home does not mean that she is educated or contributing to the greater good of humanity. Listen, I know plenty of working women who slave away at menial jobs just to pay for their weekly manicures and weekend partying. Meanwhile, their families are neglected and in crisis. You can’t pigeonhole the stay-at-home wife/mother or the working woman.
I am a stay-at-home mother and wife. My children are grown and although I went back for my master’s degree, I opted not to take a paying job. We are not wealthy, but we prefer to sacrifice money in order to have a smoothly running household. I feel fortunate to be able to spend my time focusing on my family vs. an ungrateful company. And yes, I have time to enjoy pursuits as continuing education, art, charity work, church, hobbies and (yikes!) reading good books!And by a pool, no less! Shame on me? What kind of fool wouldn’t want to take this option? Does it give you “self respect” to fight traffic, spend an hour of “quality time” with the kids doing homework, cook, clean, plop into bed and get up early the next day to continue the vicious cycle?
My husband gets many perks for having a stay-at-home wife who provides a happy home, including a clean house, great kids, and lots of s*x because I am not burned out at the end of the day. My self respect comes from a 23-year marriage during a time when divorce runs rampant, amazing children who consider their parents their best friends, volunteer work that might actually contribute to the greater good, and deep appreciation for continuing self discovery.
If Ms. Lutz thinks the only way one can be of value is through a paycheck, she is shallow and short-sighted. Some of the most important people throughout history who have contributed to humanity through pioneeering ideas, inventions and art did not have “jobs.”
A job doesn’t not define individual worth. Employment vs. unemployment has nothing to do with a thinking person’s life path.
Why must women judge each other anyway? Live and let live. There are far more troubling issues of society to deal with than “unemployed wives.” Let’s get on with it.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amCorrect me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the point of this post that being a stay-at-home mom is admirable if flawed, but that if no kids are at home, there’s no real purpose to it? I don’t really see anyone here picking on stay-at-home moms. It’s women who are intentionally unemployed and not caring for kids that are the issue here.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI’m a 20 year old college student. I don’t think it’s fair to judge a woman who chooses not to work because, unless I’m mistaken, the point of feminism was to give women the opportunities and choices that they didn’t have before. Women should have every opportunity to enter the work force. However, I don’t think they should feel like the have to work for fear of losing respect. I do think that every women should pursue her education, because that is such a vital part of self-discovery and independence. And no I don’t think it’s a waste if a a women decides not to work. I plan to get my PhD and work in HIV/AIDS research. I know that there may come a time when I decide to stay home to care for my family. I think it’s sad that I may lose the respect of some women for my choice but that certainly wouldn’t change it. I plan to work extensively with AIDS charities, whether or not I work. I fail to see how anyone could consider raising my children and devoting my time to others a waste of my time and education.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amdefinitely, I would respect a stay-at-home wife. She can get self-education at home during/when/after having already graduated a school/high-school/university. working outside home it would be too much for her. after work she till have to take care of husband, children and home. a working husband and a stay-at-home wife is a healthy family and lets face it,there arent enough jobs for every man and woman.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amChattydaddy hit the nail on the head, as far as i am concerned. I am a stay at home mom for a good period of time now and i too can relate to the way you say your mother felt. I use to feel guilty for having these feelings after all staying at home is viewed as a blessing. Most of what i have read is eathier complaining whining depressed moms or the happy it is so wonderful to be at home mom comments at other sites. I am in my case learning that this decision as much as i wanted it to be positive and rewarding has truely fallen short.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am“I don’t think the point of the women’s movement was “choice;” I think it was opportunity.”
Hear, hear; the word “choice” is so frequently misused with regards to the women’s movement, by people who don’t really understand what it’s about.
Being a stay-at-home mother is a risky but benevolent choice that clearly can benefit your children. Just being a stay-at-home wife and taking care of your home, though, is parasitic. Clearly, if you’re running a business out of your home, making art, or contributing to charity, it’s a different case, but we judge men for being lazy layabouts – why wouldn’t you judge women for doing the same? Get out of the house and make yourself useful.
And for those who are getting angry that anyone would dare to judge anyone: have you heard of this thing called the justice system? Society runs on judgment and social mores, determined by consensus. Not every “choice” is sacred and not every “choice” is as good as any other “choice.” Down the path of moral relativism lies chaos.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amThe key of what the author says is in the line where the following appears: “….when their financial situation allows it….” That is the KEY to have a CHOICE. Sometimes you have it, sometimes you don’t. If you have it now, will you have it tomorrow?
BBBGMOM commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amAPhDMom, what is on your list of jobs that better the world in a way that is more significant than supporting another individual/one’s home? I am asking, not judging. Because, based on experience, I’ll have to say that, like Former SAHW, the people I know who use their true talents and passions *tend* to not make enough money to support themselves. Granted I do have one friend whose passion and talent is making money… so she makes a lot of money with other people’s money and they reap some benefit. What are some of the talents you are thinking of that should be shared more broadly? I think that’s a fascinating idea… Also, I think there is quite a diversity within the “stay at home wife” community – those who give thousands of hours to charity are in a different category than those who spend the whole day watching TV. (In my judgy little opinion.)
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am“It is better to put your personal talents to use for the world, or at least a larger segment of the world than just your husband.”
I just don’t see how so very many people have these personal talents or use them in their jobs or that their jobs better the world very much. In fact, most of the people I know who are talented or have jobs that better the world are not paid very much.
Most of the people I know have jobs that are not very meaningful at all in the grand scheme of things. But they need or like the money and some of them like the personal satisfaction of feeling good at what they do.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI don’t think the point of the women’s movement was “choice;” I think it was opportunity. And I think it’s fine to “judge another woman’s choices” by what opportunities she grabbed or squandered. We all make moral judgements about choices all the time — why do those moral judgements stop at gender’s door? Why shouldn’t we make judgements about the values people convey with their life’s work? So, I’ll go ahead a judge — flame away. It is better to put your personal talents to use for the world, or at least a larger segment of the world than just your husband. If you can’t do anything else, fine stay home and care for just one other person. But if you can do something else, don’t be so selfish.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI also say staying home is an underappriciated job with the pay being understated because i have a son who turned 18 not long ago and moved in with his aunt and uncle at age 17 he now is very appricative of good old mom and i have the joy of seeing how my skills as a stay at home mom have made such a difference in my childrens lives. The good out weighs the bad in the war of to stay home or to work. At least for me, i can say it’s not for everyone. you have to know your limits and your needs and go from there!!!
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amListen i’m a stay at home mom i’ve been in the work force pre children, and post children, it takes balance on your part to make it work it can be done i saw some of the comments about needing adult socialization thats true you have to take time for yourself! you have to put forth an effort to take couples time in your marriage, and you have to take alone time for just you, weather it’s a hot bubble bath, a walk , or just getting away from home for an hour or so, if you feal comfortable being a stay at home mom or wife thats your choice if you can afford it. It does not mean your wasting your life ,i look at it as an investment in your family!! you make the choices no one but you can make those decisions and no one but you can decide what makes YOU happy!!!
Marie Eve commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amGood point daylily! This is what I was describing as the “flexible” part of my job…
![]()
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI guess I did this before my child was born. I did have part-time and freelance jobs on and off, but because I wanted to have them and they didn’t pay much. I have advanced degrees, but they are not in fields that make much money. I didn’t get them to earn a lot of money anyway. I got them because I was interested in the subjects and partly because I didn’t know what I wanted to do. (Not that sometimes I don’t wish I had gotten degrees in high paying fields where the work would be worth the money.)
I can’t say it was very different from being a SAHM, although I was better at taking care of everything around the house. I considered it my job to take care of all the domestic stuff and then when my husband was done with work we could hang out. We got along a lot better during that time rather then when I was working full time because we weren’t trying to divide everything up. (He could never clean a bathroom to my satisfaction.)
Like I said, now I’m a SAHM. Not that different except a little bit harder and I never get to sleep in. I definitely consider myself fortunate that I have this choice and lifestyle, although I also wish I felt more direction in my life. BTW, My husband is not some sexist goon who just wants Donna Reed. Things just kind of happened this way and he makes money doing something he loves.
And I think it’s weird to say that someone who would live this lifestyle doesn’t deserve education. How many 18 year olds do you know who know what they really want to do with their lives? Or how their lives will actually end up? Anyway, I still vote.
![]()
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amSeriously, I can’t even fathom the level of self-righteous nattering this little report has garnered. If someone chooses not to work, how the hell does that effect you and yours? Not at all, save for freeing up a space in the cubicle farm that you can claim for your very own. Really, in this tough job market, you should be THANKING the men and women who chose not to compete.
But God forbid anyone decide that they don’t really need a second paycheck to buy cheap crap at the mall, that there’s value in an existence that isn’t spend chasing the Almighty Dollar.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI would second what everyone else has said about judgmentalism. And I’d add that serious charity work is greatly helped by stay-home partners. And Bostonmama, I find it incredibly sad that you think the purpose of a college education is solely a degree. I personally think education is valuable for many reasons, including producing a more learned society.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI’m not judging either way. I am, however, a wee bit jealous of those who do get to stay home and would love to join their ranks. Just think of the garden I could have and the stuff I could bake!
![]()
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI’m not judging either way. I am, however, a wee bit jealous of those who do get to stay home and would love to join their ranks. Just think of the garden I could have and the stuff I could bake!
![]()
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI’m just curious… Many of these posts are belittling the woman who doesn’t work outside the home. I’m writing my comment at 2 o’clock in the afternoon, which means all of the previous comments were written between say, 9am and now. Do all these other posters have flexible hours, or does the work they deem so sacred consist of surfing the web and writing comments on Strollerderby when they should actually be working?
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amSounds like a pretty sweet deal to me. I’d eat Reece’s Pieces and read books all day. But seriously, I agree that everyone’s being a little judgmental [and probably jealous] Who really gives a fuck who stays home to “take care” of their husband, and who stays home to parent, and who works full time and never sees their kids, or whatever. Who cares? Do whatever works for you, and makes you happy.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 am“I think it’s fine for women to do that. But I don’t want these women in college taking up spots that my son and daughter are fighting hard for.”
Because clearly, there’s no other reason to further one’s education other than to join the rat race.
Marie Eve commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amS, I really wish you good luck! Like I said, I think what happened to me was more because it was the wrong guy and we would have most probably ended up divorcing anyway… But still, this situation is not always easy to deal with, especially “alone” in a foreign culture… Japan must be both crazy and great, and I’m not saying that this whole experience was bad for me. Living in Europe and traveling around was awesome in many counts, a priceless experience nonetheless…
And I hope I didn’t come off as too judgmental on the issue, I still think women should be free to do what works for them and their family. I was just saying that I’ve been burned before, and my own self-respect comes with a paycheck. I do realize that many people did not get the chance I had to pursue a good education and to have a job that’s rewarding, well-paying and flexible.
Still, you’ll have to admit that it’s really hard to feel sympathy for the specific class of women mentioned above, those well-off “ladies who lunch” who have everything taken care of and spend their time at the spa, the gym or the upscale mall. In a way I feel a little envious, but then I cannot help but think that usually those people have a somewhat skewed view of reality and life…
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI’d do it if I could…
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amWHO CARES? Seriously. Who the hell cares? Why is everyone so judgemental? And why is the end goal of college seen purely as financial remuneration? MY husband and I both work full time, because we have to, and I do because I have the healthcare through my job, a job that is fairly financially rewarding but not intellectually stimulating in the least. I went to college to get a well-rounded liberal arts education that has made me a happier more creative and politically engaged person overall, despite the fact that I ended up choosing the job I have now for financial reasons. If my husband were in a position where he made enough for me to stay home and work on the things I wanted to work on, what is wrong with that? WHO CARES! Some people have a job that they enjoy and is remunerative, some people have jobs that they dislike but they need to take and they do other things they enjoy or are interested at other times, sometimes the woman in a heterosexual marriage wants to stay home, sometimes the man does, WHO CARES! It takes all kinds of people to make a world and everything isn’t a commodity, for crying out loud. If, instead of having these ridiculous judgy-fests everyone would focus on changing this country so that EVERYONE had better economic options, that we had universal healthcare and daycare and better education, then more people would be able to find the balance that was best for them and their families.
leahsmom commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI feel like, I don’t care if someone stays at home, whether to take care of kids or not – whether they work hard with “gusto” at raising a family, or spend the day sleeping and playing the Wii, why should I care? It doesn’t affect me, and, if one spouse is keeping the earnings up, doesn’t affect the use of my taxes any differently than two working spouses would. So why should I care what these people are doing with their lives? Don’t we all have better things to hate on each other about?
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amMan, judgey crowd. Perhaps the women here have had great careers, but most jobs are not rewarding. Really, if you had to choose between answering phones for a used car dealership and staying home, what would you choose? So many jobs and work environments are unrewarding and degrading, particularly to women. That so many women continue to choose to stay home does not necessarily say something about their work ethics, but perhaps the quality of work available to many women–even women with high-earning husbands. Perhaps particularly women with high earning husbands.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amJoy: So you are saying if you pay a housekeeper to clean your house and do your laundry then you consider it work. But if one person in a marriage or partnership wants to stay home and do the same then it’s not?
I’ll agree that there are people who sit on their butts all day and do as little as possible. I’m not talking about them. But there are people who approach looking after their family with as much gusto as they would going to a paying job.
Earning a salary is great (and that’s my primary task throughout the day at this point in my life), but just because someone doesn’t earn money for their day’s accomplishments at home doesn’t mean they are not contributing to society in some way or working hard at what they do.
In short, what I’m saying is cut the homemaker a little slack, but not the internet/tv addicted stay-at-home wife.
![]()
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI grew up in the Hamptons where a stay-at-home wife is the norm. And these women don’t even clean their own houses–they hire every thing out, from cleaning to cooking to the gardening. Then the women spend their days shopping, eating out and organizing galas.
If it weren’t for these women (and Puffy’s parties) there just wouldn’t be a Hamptons and where would we all be then?
But seriously…if they can afford not to work, let them stay out of the workforce and let me have what would have been their ridiculously high-paying job.
diera commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI would say that although I might not to be able to help a bit of private judging, as long as both partners are happy and no one’s on welfare then I’d have a hard time knowing what to complain about. It seems like at least as valid a choice as two-income households with no kids who wind up spending their huge money surplus on what seems to me to be ridiculous levels of consumer excess. However, if I were going to pursue that path, I’d want my husband to have a TON of life insurance and to have signed some kind of pre-nup guaranteeing me support, because were he to die or divorce me after I’d spent twenty years exploring my creative outlets and baking cookies, I’d be SOL where earning capacity is concerned.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI’ll admit it. I have very little respect for ANYONE, man or woman, who doesn’t work, unless there’s a specific reason (such as a health reason, or if one partner does work in a country where the other partner CANNOT work for legal reasons). Being in school and/or parenting counts as work for me. Pro bono work (such as serious charity involvement) counts. Keeping up the home and looking after your spouse, but nothing else, does not.
BBBGMOM commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amVery interesting… makes me think of a couple I know in which the man stayed home for a couple of years (this was pre-kid) while wife climbed the corporate ladder and paid all the bills. He was depressed (but wouldn’t admit it.) How did he spend his days? Playing video games and waiting for the clock to strike noon to justify his beer(s.) What I find so interesting is that a stay-at-home wife sans children may be viewed as a status symbol, while the stay-at-home husband sans children is probably seen as a loafer. I pass no judgment – I am old/wise enough to know that none of us really knows what makes other people’s marriages or unions work.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI agree with “lilacorchid”. I thought feminism was about having the ability to CHOOSE what we wanted to do. It turns out that that only applies if we make certain “feminist-approved” choices, which is just as wrong.
haylmerri commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amMy sister-in-law is a stay at home wife. I totally judge her. Why did she go to all the trouble of earning a degree just so she can sit at home all day long?
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI thought the whole point of women’s lib was choice. Some women want to stay home and look after their family, even if it is only their husband. Why so much hate?
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amDamn Bostonmama. Bitter much?
cryitout commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI’d pay money for that gig.
Anonymous commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI may soon be in a similar situation. My partner has an opportunity to move to Japan and I probably would not be able to work, excepting for any freelance writing work that came my way. The best I could do would be to finally buckle down to the book I keep promising to write. We’ve talked about it, and I’ve told him that he’d have to be okay with me not working and not be resentful of it. But it makes me nervous nonetheless. I’d much rather work, though I think I’d appreciate the time to work on other creative projects that this opportunity could allow. I think the key is to be sure your husband understands that your housework and creative work, even if it doesn’t earn a paycheck, is economically valuable.
Marie Eve commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI was in such a situation in my mid-twenties when my then-husband was offered a job in Germany and moving there meant I couldn’t get a work visa. I did work on my master’s thesis a little, but all in all it didn’t keep me that busy either.
Maybe it was just because it was the wrong guy, but well, after this experience, we’re not together anymore. The whole situation and its financial aspect was really painful and stressful (he was making more than enough money to support both of us, but going from earning a living to depending on him didn’t go smoothly at all). Even though he knew it was the deal from the beginning, he somehow resented me from having all this free time and not having a “reason” to stay home (I wasn’t ready for a child yet, thank god).
I am a mom now and I’m with the greatest guy, but even though things are completely different I would never put myself in such a situation again. Not so much because it wouldn’t be possible financially, but because for me it’s really a question of validation and self-respect and dignity.
By the way, it widely varies from culture to culture. I don’t know of any stay-at-home wife here in Canada, but while I lived in Germany it appeared to be a completely normal and expected thing…
Manjari commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI think it’s up to every person and every couple to decide what’s best for themselves. I don’t care whether other people stay home, go to work, work from home, write novels, write blogs, go to school, or whatever else they want to do. I did not have had the financial luxury to not work before I had the twins, or I might have pursued an additional degree.
Bostonmama commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI think it’s fine for women to do that. But I don’t want these women in college taking up spots that my son and daughter are fighting hard for. If you know you want to be a stay-at-home, maybe you should begin staying at home right after high school.
chattydaddy commented on Jan 01 70 at 12:00 amI fully respect the decision of a woman to focus exclusively on parenting — it sure as hell is a full time job, at least for ten years or so. But I wouldn’t want it to be my wife, or my daughter for that matter, as you say. That’s because I believe that everyone — men and women — need validation on a daily basis from other adults. In the case of my mother, she became more controlling and difficult in the evenings because she was not fully socially nourished during the day, which became a problem in my parent’s marriage that eventually lead to divorce.
In the old family farm days, mothers did much more than just mother — they were partners in running the family business and did a wide range of important things in addition to watching over the kids. Modern technology and distribution of labor have reduced the job of being a mom to a much more constrained set of responsibilities, which has ironically made the job harder and less rewarding. I think it’s a quick trip to marriage problems, unless the mother is unusually zen and doesn’t need a lot of ego validation.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes


The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.