Child and Youth Services authorities removed a 3-day-old baby from her mother after the mother tested positive for opiates. But Elizabeth Mort says a poppy see bagel is to blame for her failed drug test.
A law in Pennsylvania allows hospitals to screen routinely for drugs following the birth of a baby. But the Pittsburgh American Civil Liberties Union is suing Jameson Hospital for not taking into account what the mother had eaten before getting a court order to have the child removed.
A hospital spokesperson says they followed the law.
The baby has since been returned to Mort, and the hospital is reviewing its procedures.
Is there more to this story? Did a hospital really not question the results before pushing for a newborn to be removed from its home? Were there other suspicious signs? Is there really no due process for parents — and children, whom the law that allows for routine screening supposedly protects?
On the other hand: a poppy seed bagel? Could one really contain enough opiates to show up in a significant amount in a blood test?
But back to removing a child without question: is this really the only option in cases like this and like this?
American Girl Doll Flunks College
Does Motherhood Define Michelle Obama
New Breastfeeding Gadget — Is it Necessary?
End of a (Short) Era: Rhee Resigns
Miners Rescue Underway
National Stop Sucking Your Thumb Day
Blogger‘s Child Strikes Back
The Science Behind Grown-ups Who Cry Over Cartoons
Is it Ever OK to Call Something Gay?
Documentary Film Questions High-Stakes Education