Previous Post Next Post


Brought to you by

Cyberbully Parent Behaving Badly

By KJ Dell'Antonia |

Cyberbully students are causing endless angst for schools who feel obligated to interfere when students bully and are bullied–but aren’t sure where the limitations of their authority lie. Legal wrangling about cyberbullying goes on–and so does the debate about what a parent’s role should be when it’s his kid on one side or the other of the online equation. Last week’s New York Times article spotlighted one parent who sued on behalf of his daughter, who was suspended from her Beverly Hills high school for posting a video online in which other students called a fellow eighth grade girl “ugly,” “spoiled,” a “brat” and a “slut.” The parent said he chastised his daughter. “That wasn’t a nice thing to do.” But still, he sued, and the court revoked the girl’s suspension and awarded court costs.

Putting aside the legal situation, bloggers like Strollerderby’s Madeline Holler wondered if the lawsuit-happy dad did more than chastise his daughter. Did he, perhaps, take away her cell phone? Limit her time online? Do anything at all to suggest that such “not nice” behavior, even if legal and outside the boundaries of school authority, would not be tolerated? At Tablet, commenters on an article about cyberbullying wondered the same thing–and the dad himself showed up in the debate.

He never did answer the question–but he did reveal exactly where his offspring learned her charming online manners.

Tablet columnist Marjorie Ingall was squaring off  with editor Liel Liebovitz in a debate on how parents and schools should respond to cyberbullying. Ingalls said that regardless of the law, parents should be teaching kids that any form of online meanness is wrong. In reference to the father who sued his daughter’s school for suspending her over an online video post that he saw as well within her constitutional rights, Ingall said “There was a teachable moment here, and he blew it like a vuvuzela.” She thought dad should have had his daughter “nuke the video, apologize to the girl, accept the school’s punishment, get your own punishment at home, and have a serious discussion about values and morals.”

That sounds good. I’m thinking a nice long vacation from her laptop, cell phone and video camera was in order, along with an apology (maybe filmed for YouTube posterity?) Instead, although the girl apparently offered to take the video down, her father insisted that it remain online “to assist in the public debate.” And then he sued.

I’m not taking a position on whether the video–or any online bullying–constitutes free speech, and neither did Ingall. I’d go even farther than she did, and argue that a bunch of vague laws attempting to regulate this particular issue will probably do more harm than good, although I’d support the idea of schools making their own policies on this, and having students sign them, agreeing to maintain a civil environment online as well as in the hallways. But Ingalls stuck to the narrower question, arguing that the parent in question, one Evan S. Cohen, had an obligation to take the opportunity to teach his daughter that what’s legal isn’t always moral, and, in the words of one commenter, “sometimes it’s better to be kind than right.”

Ingall asked. Commenters asked. “Mr. Cohen, did you in fact reprimand your daughter in any way for her behavior?”

And Mr. Cohen sailed into the fray. He defended his child’s actions, saying that posting a “stupid, juvenile video of some kids talking about other kids” was not cyberbullying. He hailed himself as a defender of constitutional rights. He argued that the school’s policies, and the law, did not permit it to punish a child for an incident that took place wholly outside of the school. As for the question at hand?

He didn’t answer it. And the commenters called him on it: “The issue under discussion in this column isn’t the legal question of whether the school had the right to punish [your] daughter. The issue is the moral question of how parents should discharge their responsibilities to raise their kids as decent human beings in an environment where giving vent to one’s most vicious inclinations is so easy to do.”

I did answer it, he said. You just didn’t like my answer. It wasn’t cyberbullying. It was a “minor incident.”

I take that to mean his lack of a response constituted a response: he didn’t consider the incident worthy of a reprimand. Commenters weren’t so sure. They kept asking. They debated the legal issue. They got angry. Cohen followed suit. And kindness went right out the window.

“Get over it, Elise, you hack. … If it were up to you, one “mean” text message would land a student in irons, rights revoked, sitting at home, suspended, or, as you apparently want, in jail. You sicken me. … What’s your law school, idiot? Right. You didn’t go to one. You’re also a liar.”

And I do believe we have an answer to the question of why Cohen didn’t reprimand his daughter for a mere video of other eighth graders insulting one of her fellow students.  On the contrary, he probably called her up onto the carpet for failing to get out in front of the camera. When parents think there’s no reason for civility in online discourse, we have to assume our kids are going to follow.

More on Babble

About KJ Dell'Antonia


KJ Dell'Antonia

KJ Dell'Antonia is a regular contributor to Slate's DoubleX, a contributing editor for Kiwi Magazine and the co-author of Reading with Babies, Toddlers and Twos. She lives in New Hampshire with four kids, two dogs, one husband and a bad coffee habit and blogs about family bonds, balance, and blend at

« Go back to Mom

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, profile photo and other personal information you make public on Facebook (e.g., school, work, current city, age) will appear with your comment. Comments, together with personal information accompanying them, may be used on and other Babble media platforms. Learn More.

13 thoughts on “Cyberbully Parent Behaving Badly

  1. Mistress_Scorpio says:

    *stands and applauds every freaking word in this article*

  2. Ri-chan says:

    While I find any form of bullying unacceptable I also find it unacceptable that a school would punish a child for something that happened outside of school. That’s the parents job. And some parents suck. But it’s still legal to raise your child to be a jerk, so the guy did nothing legally wrong, just morally maybe.

  3. angie says:

    When the school overreacts and overreaches, it puts the child’s entire family in a defensive posture, rather than a lesson-teaching frame of mind. Similarly, the school’s actions put the family in the public view and invited a lot of on-line commenters to start rattling off their assumptions about what the girl’s parents “probably” did or did not do. Which drove her father further into a corner. That’s not the way to get a lovely, civil reaction out of anyone. Granted, he should have stayed out of it, but it sounds like the columnist and her commenters were thrilled to have him show up.

    Bottom line, about 75% of commenters on news forums (blogs can set a different tone) tend to be chain-yankers and agitators, and you are just never going to see a nicey-nice discussion held in that kind of a forum.

  4. Linda says:

    “nuke the video, apologize to the girl, accept the school’s punishment, get your own punishment at home, and have a serious discussion about values and morals.”

  5. Linda says:

    If my daughter did something like that, I’d be so filled with shame over my own parenting, I don’t know what I’d do. I can’t believe the dad tried to defend that.

  6. Mistress_Scorpio says:

    The school’s actions didn’t put the family in public view. The action of this demonstrably bullying daughter and subsequently her self-righteous and arrogant father did.

  7. Lisa says:

    Who will act if not the schools? If a student complains about being a victim of cyber bullying, it will most likely be to another student or their counselor as we teach them to do. Granted, I don’t know if the school can punish a child for actions that occur outside of school but in every instance I’ve been involved in, there was some form of in school bullying as well which they were punished for. We can of course educate students (individually if necessary) about appropriate use of the Internet.

  8. JBoogie says:

    I’ve said this before, but if you open that theoretical door and allow the schools (i.e. the government) to start regulating behavior outside their own walls, it’s only going to continue. Schools can address the bullying happening at school, and if the video was uploaded on a school computer (not likely because of firewalls, but still) or on a phone while at school (she probably isn’t supposed to have it there anyway), then the school has every right to be involved. But if it happened at home, then the school shouldn’t intervene. Bringing the schools into our homes is not a road we want to go down, because it won’t stop with bullying. That’s just the hot-button issue right now.

  9. JBoogie says:

    And I do agree Lisa–if a student complains about bullying it’s probably going to be to a teacher or counselor at school. And at that point, it becomes the teacher or counselor’s responsibility to first notify all parents involved, find out where the bullying is happening, and decide how to deal with it. But if Student X comes to me and says “That girl called me a slut on Facebook”, I call Student X’s parents and tell them that there is a bullying issue online and I am going to keep my eye out for any bullying happening at school, but I can’t discipline the name-caller until I have evidence of bullying happening on school grounds.

  10. jenny tries too hard says:

    As much as I hate the idea of government/public schools overstepping their bounds, I think this is a case where the school, if not law enforcement, should intervene…the video caused the school to be a hostile environment for the other girl.

  11. NRA says:

    It’s important for cyberbullies to know that just because the government failed in their attempt to prosecute this turd, that there aren’t those of us out there who will deal with you privately.

  12. Ri-chan says:

    I just don’t want our schools to turn into Japan’s (as much as I love Japan, it’s a country I love!) In Japan, they can even tell students where they can and can’t go after school. If the school bans a certain mall and a student from that school is caught at that mall, the student can be punished O.o

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

Previous Post Next Post