Dad Labeled a Pedophile for Photographing His Own Kid

cameraA dad who tried to snap a cute photo of his (fully-clothed) toddler at a mall is angry that a mall cop told him he couldn’t – because he might be a pedophile.

Mr. Mall Cop, repeat after me – anyone can be a pedophile, but taking a photograph of a fully-clothed child does . . . what?

Set aside, for a moment, that Kevin Geraghty-Shewan was the father of little Ben who just wanted to take a photo of the tot on a train in the mall. Even if he was some random weirdo, the photo of a child taken in a public setting gives that person nothing more than a lasting impression of something they’re able to see anyway.

Put in an even simpler way – if he’s going to get his jollies off on what a child looks like standing fully-clothed in the middle of a mall, he doesn’t need a camera.

The story made the BBC after Geraghty-Shewan says a cop showed up and started asking for his identification over the matter. The mall says it takes security very seriously.

Again – what’s the security issue with a photograph? Especially in Britain, a country known for its big brother cameras on every corner, the idea that a child might be caught in someone’s photo is less a security risk than it is a fact.

We walk around in public. We are caught on surveillance cameras for banks, stores, storage facilities. If you live in a tourist area, you’re caught on hundreds of vacation videos and snapshots. In major cities, you’re in the background of television broadcasts, even B roll for movies.

Don’t want your child photographed by a pedophile? Roll out the bubble, because it’s time to keep them inside for the rest of their lives.

Image: Shermeee, flickr

More by this author:

Article Posted 6 years Ago
share this article
facebook twitter tumblr pinterest
See Comments
what do you think?
share this article
facebook twitter tumblr pinterest
See Comments
what do you think?
what do you think?
close comments
Subscribe to the
Welcome to
Sign Out
Follow us on