Categories

Mark Zuckerberg's Obscene Policy

mark zuckerberg, facebook photos

You think this is obscene? You should see the ones that didn't get removed!

About a year ago, The New York Times published and article headlined “Facebook Won’t Budge on Breastfeeding Photos.” Judging from recent updates on the Facebook page called, “Hey Facebook, Breastfeeding is Not Obscene,” the Times story could be rerun today with few edits.

For those needing a little background, Facebook has a policy of investigating photos that have been flagged for removal and taking down those that it deems obscene. A lot of women noticed that photos of them breastfeeding had been flagged and removed. Facebook stated that it wasn’t the breastfeeding that was the problem, but the fact that nipples were showing. Because there are so many users, they simply had to draw the line at nudity and leave it at that.

But here’s the problem: it’s not that simple. Strollerderby blogger Danielle reposted some examples of pictures that haven’t been removed from Facebook on her personal blog, Momotics. She juxtaposed them with photos of moms breastfeeding that had been removed. If the breastfeeding pics are obscene, wouldn’t the more exposed chests in the other pictures be too?

(Also, NB: there are no nipples in any of pictures, breastfeeding or otherwise, including the curious shot of Nana’s nums-nums dressed up as Minnie Mouse.)

I know there are people who find public breastfeeding a little “ew.” And they’re the ones that say “cover up! Don’t make us all look!” To them I say, “your neck works. No one’s making you look.” I feel like the same argument can be made for those who feel like they have to flag breastfeeding photos for removal: don’t look, unfriend, make a comment. But flagging?

The Momotics post shows the warped sense of modesty and obscenity that we have in the U.S. It’s like the people who complain about a mother not covering up when she’s breastfeeding at the pool. Do they not see the skimpy bikini tops and barely there bottoms? I’m not arguing for burqinis or saying tiny swim suits are bad. But such blatant inconsistency?

Now thats obscene.

MORE ON STROLLERDERBY

1o Books for Your Christmas Wish List

Hospital Visitation Policy to Soon be Humane

When Geeks Over Think the Holidays

Real Pro Cheerleaders (With PhDs!) Encourage Girls in Science

Bill Nye the Science Guy Collapses

Jimmy Kimmel on National Unfriend Day

6 Survival Tips for Kate Middleton

A Teacher’s Subtle Sexism

No Such Thing as “Oops!” Pregnancies

10 Common Myths About Adoption

Revolt Against TSA … Will You?

Cindy McCain Blames Her Husband for Gay Suicides

Healthy French Fry? Um, Not Really.

9 Subversive Bedtime Stories

Would Gross Pictures Keep you From Smoking?

More Naked Pregnant Women. And That is Good.

Dear Erica Jong: We Parent in a Vacuum, Not a Prison

Do Writer Moms Owe Their Kids More Privacy?

Squinkies? What are Squinkies?

Kids Mental Health Break? It’s Called the Weekend

My Son is Gay

Photo: Momotics

Tagged as: ,

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, profile photo and other personal information you make public on Facebook (e.g., school, work, current city, age) will appear with your comment. Learn More.