Should Safe Haven Laws Be Changed to Protect Older Kids?

I’m sure the buzz is still going strong this morning after yesterday’s  Casey Anthony verdict. I think of her daughter Caylee, as well as a recent case in my own community- Christian Choate, only 13 and locked in a cage by his parents until he was killed. And the recent headline shocker of the girl found alive in a cage in Virginia.

I do not like to talk or even think about these gruesome stories but I have to wonder, could these children or many kids not in the spotlight be saved if the Safe Haven laws- laws allowing parents to give up their infant to authorities with no questions asked-  were changed to include older children?

Most of the Safe Haven laws only accommodate an infant around 3-30 days old. You can find your state’s Safe Haven law here. A few years ago Nebraska did change their law to any child under the age 18, but changed it back to 30 days old because of too many deserted teenage children. I know there probably isn’t a perfect answer or solution, but I would think the abandoned children at a safe place is better than them being abused or killed. And yes, it could mean parents would be walking free from something they should be punished for but- again- so often they are “found out” much too late. What law is in the best interest of the children?

image source

Is society’s access to too much information causing Parenting Anxiety?

Tagged as: , ,

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, profile photo and other personal information you make public on Facebook (e.g., school, work, current city, age) will appear with your comment. Learn More.