Previous Post Next Post

Mom

Brought to you by

What the Chicago Public Schools Strike is Really About: Public Education in the U.S.

By Madeline Holler |

chicago teachers union, chicago school strike

via: Occupied Chicago Tribune Picket outside Darwin Elementary in Logan Square on September 10. (Photo: Matt McLoughlin)

If you only read the headlines over at news outlets like MSNBC, you’d think teachers in Chicago refused to go to work today because they really want to stick it to public school parents.

400,000 Kids Stranded as Chicago Teachers Strike,” is the headline for one video. “Teachers Walk Out on 350,000 Chicago Kids,” read another. The interviews go on to interview parents, most of whom are (understandably) anywhere from frustrated to outraged that they have to scramble to find some place, possibly long-term, for their kids to go while they’re at work.

What the headlines don’t mention, and the stories most often only scratch at, are the reasons the Chicago Teachers Union won’t sign the contract and, therefore, 30,000 teachers won’t go to work. It’s not just about pay raises — both sides agree they’re getting close on compensation issues.

What Chicago Public School teachers are striking for are things that are affecting public school kids all over the U.S., not just in Chicago. They’re striking for their city’s schools, but honestly, they’re striking for my city’s schools, too.

In These Times picked up a post over on Occupied Chicago Tribune, which lists four reasons the teachers are striking — not specific bargaining points, but broad areas of difference, which, if ignored in this contract, sets this district on a course that will be difficult to reverse.

Here’s what the progressive journal posted [via Occupied Chicago Tribune]:

A better school day: A comprehensive education including not only curricula in math, science and history but also art, music, physical education and foreign languages in all Chicago Public Schools.

Wraparound services and adequate staffing to support students in need: This includes counselors, social workers, librarians and school nurses with defined job descriptions as well as preparation and break time.

Recall rights for educators and school staff: Hundreds of teachers have already been displaced by school closures across the city and more will be by the planned closing of at least 100 more schools in the coming years.

Fair compensation: No merit pay, less reliance on standardized tests and pay commensurate to increased time in the classroom as well as inflation. CPS reneged last year on the contractually obligated 4 percent pay raise negotiated in 2007 and is currently offering annual 2 percent raises over the next four years. An independent fact-finder’s report released in July recommended pay raises of 15-18 percent next year.

The actual Chicago Tribune determined three key points that still separate the CPS and the Chicago Teachers Union:

SALARIES AND BENEFITS. The district offered 16 percent increase over four years and “modified step increases that both reward experience and provide better incentives for mid-career teachers.” The union said it’s closer on pay but is still concerned about rising health care costs and other benefits. Teachers sought a substantial raise in the contract’s first year because of the longer day and want to keep raises for experience.

JOB SECURITY. The union has pushed for a system to recall teachers who have been laid off when new openings occur. This has become important because of rumors the district plans to close up to 100 schools in coming years. The district says teachers displaced by school closings will be eligible for a job at new schools if there is a vacancy — or may elect to take a three-month severance.

TEACHER EVALUATIONS. The union wants to lower how much student performance contributes to evaluations. CPS has said the new evaluation system, created in collaboration with teachers, was negotiated and settled in March under state law.

As for MSNBC’s headlines, yes, kids were out of school. But 140 of them opened for the morning in order to get kids who rely on school for breakfast and lunch fed. The thing about strikes is they’re not meant to be convenient for everyone. They mean to show the necessity of the striking party, the power of them. They’re meant to ensure that workers have a voice.

Education reform is moving quickly in the U.S., too quickly, and it’s moving ahead with too little science and research to back up its effectiveness. Ed Reform is stripping public schools of things like recess, art, music and, you know, time to think. Ed Reform is also placing way to much emphasis on students’ abilities and interest in taking one single test and having the results of that test determine everything from whether their teacher gets to keep her job to whether their school gets to stay open the next year. Ed Reform thinks its putting a social justice mission into public education, when in reality, it’s bolstering the status quo. Ed reform does nothing to address poverty issues — it only punishes poor kids, who are less likely to have all the advantages of kids who were born to educated parents.

Ed reform is creating a whole industry of standardized tests developers who turn around and become developers of matchy-matchy standardized and shallow curriculum that is also, increasingly, pushing developmentally inappropriate tasks onto younger and younger kids. Ed reform creates a mistrust of teachers; it treats them like inherently lazy professionals who, without some kind of paternal oversight wouldn’t care enough about the kids in their classes to figure out how to get through to them.

The fact that teachers in Chicago are willing to throw themselves in front of this moving truck of Ed reform in order to push back against this is something I’m personally watching closely and thankful for. Someone’s gotta put the brakes on.

SOURCE

 

More on Babble

About Madeline Holler

madeline-holler

Madeline Holler

Madeline Holler is a writer, journalist, and blogger. She has written for Babble since the site launched in 2006. Her writing has appeared in various other publications both online and in print, including Salon and True/Slant (now Forbes). A native of the Midwest, Madeline lives, writes, and parents in Southern California, where she's raising two daughters and a son. Read bio and latest posts → Read Madeline's latest posts →

« Go back to Mom

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, profile photo and other personal information you make public on Facebook (e.g., school, work, current city, age) will appear with your comment. Comments, together with personal information accompanying them, may be used on Babble.com and other Babble media platforms. Learn More.

7 thoughts on “What the Chicago Public Schools Strike is Really About: Public Education in the U.S.

  1. CW says:

    Oh, puh-LEEZE. This isn’t about wanting art & music in the schools- it’s about $$$$ and protecting guaranteed salary increases with seniority regardless of performance. I bet most private sector workers would love a guaranteed raise simply for being on the job another couple of years rather than having to earn it.

  2. Albert says:

    Great article. Thank you so much for the context and realistic perspective. CPS teachers are asking for basic things: textbooks on the first day of school, not the sixth week, air conditioning for schools which hold classes in august, libraries and librarians, nurses, and school counselors.

  3. bunnytwenty says:

    Thanks for covering this, Carolyn! The mainstream media are covering this as though it’s unpopular, but check out these pictures of folks marching in support:
    http://www.substancenews.net/articles.php?page=3590
    This is also a women’s issue – teachers are, after all, mostly women, and we get paid less for, well, everything.

  4. HT says:

    As a Chicagoan, I’ve been following this closely, of course. I also have extensive experience as part of a partner organization in the Chicago public schools, and many of my friends are teachers.
    But here’s the thing: While I support most of the teachers’ demands, they are just as good at playing the rhetoric game as the administration is. Being a teacher is hard and valuable work. But there needs to be a better standard for accountability. The teacher’s union was involved with designing the system in this contract, which will not even be in force for another year. I’ve been in classrooms where the teacher answered his cell phone during a lesson. Not for an emergency, mind you, just to chat. Where one of the only computers in the school was in that classroom, so older students would be playing violent video games in the background while 4th graders tried to learn. And that’s all the benign stuff.
    The CPS system does not work. I believe in public education, and I’m on my local school council, but my child will not be attending our local school any time soon. I wish that were not the case.
    At any rate, there are valid points on both sides of this issue, and I hope it can be resolved quickly and effectively for our children’s sake.
    Oh – and those schools that are open — only elementary schools, no instruction (obviously) just minimal supervision. And the kids have to cross a picket line to get in. That may explain why my office’s conference room was screening Pixar movies back-to-back yesterday for my co-worker’s children.

  5. Amanda says:

    If only these teachers had to live on a salary that a teacher in Iowa makes on average, which is significantly less than those in Chicago. Teacher evaluation and raises should be based on student success. Most jobs do not just give you a raise because you have a contract signed, you get a raise based on performance. I am a licensed teacher in Iowa. I have met so many more teachers who are more concerned in the beginning of the year with their contract and making sure their pay raise is there rather than focus on improving their curriculum in order to assist students in succeeding.

  6. Melinda says:

    Thank you for this article! It’s about time they do something, too.
    See, I have noticed the decline in children’s education, as a former, laid off nanny, and it’s NOT the teachers’ fault! Where did the days go that children and their PARENTS were held accountable for the child’s education? Now, children are getting these ‘cookie cutter’ lesson plans, because the teachers are being held accountable for something they have been given little control over.
    Parents need to start playing a much bigger part in their children’s education – the focus needs to be put on THEM, not the teachers.
    These teachers aren’t just out to get more money. Society is putting too much pressure on them in all the wrong places.
    YES teachers are there to teach, but they can’t do it well if the schools don’t give them the proper tools and the parents don’t give them the proper support. Teachers can be the best instructors in the world but without these things, kids are bound to start failing.
    I may have gone slightly off topic, but I feel very strongly about the way teachers are being treated lately.
    And yea, maybe they deserve more money anyway, with the way parents have been treating them.

  7. icon set says:

    You are absolutely right. In it something is also to me it seems it is good thouvht. I agree with you.

    P.S. Please review icons

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

Previous Post Next Post