Categories
Loading
Welcome to Babble,
Settings
Sign Out

Get the Babble Newsletter!

Already have an account? .

Bogus C-Section News?

It seems that Horton misheard the WHO.

Yesterday I blogged about the World Health Organization’s recommendations for C-section limits with the best intentions, pulling info from the BBC and Fox News. But, if the folks over at theunnecesarean.com are to believed– and they make a compelling case– the WHO story is bogus.

The BBC piece, apparently inspired by a Newscore.com item, is titled, “Should there be a limit on Caesareans?” It claimed that WHO had rescinded their recommendation that c-sections be limited to 10-15% due to lack of “empirical evidence.” Fox ran with it.  However, the quotes used to support this headline– taken from WHO’s Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Core: A Handbook–were out of context; vital information was left out. In a nutshell, WHO hasn’t changed their position at all.

Here is the full quote from WHO’s Handbook, via theunnecesarean.com:

“Although WHO has recommended since 1985 that the rate not exceed 10—15% (125), thereis no empirical evidence for an optimum percentage or range of percentages, despite a growing body of research that shows a negative effect of high rates (126-128). It should be noted that the proposed upper limit of 15% is not a target to be achieved but rather a threshold not to be exceeded. Nevertheless, the rates in most developed countries and in many urban areas of lesser-developed countries are above that threshold. Ultimately, what matters most is that all women who need caesarean sections actually receive them.”

Henci Goer offered a full breakdown of the WHO position at Science and Sensibility last October! You can read it here.

I feel completely icky getting caught up in a blogosphere swirl of hype. Here I was reading the BBC, thinking, this is big! How could this not get any coverage in the US? I went to the WHO website and had no luck locating the quote. I do not have a copy of WHO’s Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Core: A Handbook. I didn’t question the BBC. I will continue to track the coverage.

photo: Alex Barth/Flickr

FacebookTwitterGoogle+TumblrPinterest
Tagged as: , ,

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, profile photo and other personal information you make public on Facebook (e.g., school, work, current city, age) will appear with your comment. Learn More.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+TumblrPinterest