Baby Removed; Mom Blames Bagel

american civil liberties union, false positive
Does this contain controlled substances?

Child and Youth Services authorities removed a 3-day-old baby from her mother after the mother tested positive for opiates. But Elizabeth Mort says a poppy see bagel is to blame for her failed drug test.

A law in Pennsylvania allows hospitals to screen routinely for drugs following the birth of a baby. But the Pittsburgh American Civil Liberties Union is suing Jameson Hospital for not taking into account what the mother had eaten before getting a court order to have the child removed.

A hospital spokesperson says they followed the law.

The baby has since been returned to Mort, and the hospital is reviewing its procedures.

Is there more to this story? Did a hospital really not question the results before pushing for a newborn to be removed from its home? Were there other suspicious signs? Is there really no due process for parents — and children, whom the law that allows for routine screening supposedly protects?

On the other hand: a poppy seed bagel? Could one really contain enough opiates to show up in a significant amount in a blood test?

But back to removing a child without question: is this really the only option in cases like this and like this?

More Posts

American Girl Doll Flunks College

Does Motherhood Define Michelle Obama

New Breastfeeding Gadget — Is it Necessary?

End of a (Short) Era: Rhee Resigns

Miners Rescue Underway

National Stop Sucking Your Thumb Day

Blogger‘s Child Strikes Back

The Science Behind  Grown-ups Who Cry Over Cartoons

Is it Ever OK to Call Something ‘Gay‘?

Documentary Film Questions High-Stakes Education


Article Posted 6 years Ago
share this article
facebook twitter tumblr pinterest
See Comments
what do you think?
share this article
facebook twitter tumblr pinterest
See Comments
what do you think?
what do you think?
close comments

Related Videos